Quantcast
Channel: Understanding Each Other, Diversity and Dissent
Viewing all 411 articles
Browse latest View live

Only in Africa - Keep your wedding in church

$
0
0


 

 

 


 

 


“As you are aware, messages sent by e-mail can be manipulated by third parties. For this reason our e-mail messages are generally not legally binding. This electronic message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be for the use of the intended addressee only. Please be aware that any disclosure, copy, distribution or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify me immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.â€



India Abroad says: “America sacrificed Mumbai” to protect its informant David Headley

$
0
0







Pictured left: David Coleman Headley, born Daood Gilani. Right: Sajid Mir, the Lashkar-i-Taiba chief in charge of foreign recruits. Background: Fire and smoke gush out of the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel during the 2008 Mumbai attacks. (Photo by Indranil Mukherjee/AFP/Getty Images)





FROM MY DEAR FRIEND AMBASSADOR Gajendra Singh  from India




5 year old Dawood along with his younger sister and mother Serril Headley







david headley




FROM www.orbat.com of the US -Indian analyst Mr Ravi Rikhye


Staff


Editor & Publisher
Ravi Rikhye

ANALYSTS

  • A.H. Amin
  • Mandeep S.Bajwa
  • Tom Cooper
  • Hamid Hussain
  • Ravi Rikhye
  • Colin Robinson
  • Animesh Roul
  • Talleyrand*

* In service; writes anonymously.

FOR YOUR INFORMATION

Background article on Waziristan, Pakistan*

*With our compliments

April 2006 Archive
March 2006 Archive

Articles in archives include:

- Iran Air Force vs US airpower
- US First wave Precision Strike Capability
-Military Briefing: Global Deployment of US and Allied Naval Forces 3.24.2006

 





Wednesday 0230 GMT December 4, 2013

 

·         India Abroad says: "America sacrificed Mumbai" This explosive charge is that to protect its informant David Headley, America let the 2008 attack on Mumbai (Bombay) proceed The India Abroad issue of November 29, 2013 features an interview by a correspondent for the weekly with Adrian Levy who has coauthored a book "The siege: 68-hours inside the Taj Hotel". Levy has used unclassified reports and interviews with US officials and others.

 

·         Levy himself makes a somewhat less inflammatory statement: "America concealed its knowledge, its true knowledge of the growing risk to Mumbai".

 

·         The problem is that the interview does not support either charge. Levy carefully points out that the US caught wind of the plot to attack Mumbai in 2006, and constantly kept Indian intelligence informed of development. Except that the US did not know the specific targets within Mumbai, it identified the city, the number of terrorists involved, their mode of arrival, their possession of RDX, etc. etc.

 

·         So why does Levy say America concealed its true knowledge of the growing danger? Because it did not tell India the source of the information – America's double and triple agent David Headley; nor did it arrest Headley.

 

·         Incidentally, David Headley, despite his name, is not an American. He is of Pakistani origin and changed his name at some point, and became an American citizen. Just thought we'd get that out of the way for our American readers.

 

·         Editor has no doubt that Levy has worked hard and sincerely to uncover the story behind Mumbai 2008. Indeed, his first reaction was to curse the tribe he once belonged to, Indian journalists. Why did this story have to be left to two Americans? What on earth have the Indians been doing since 2008? Sorry, this needs another explanation. While in India for 20-years, Editor did various things, including write for the print media. He has never been a journalist in the sense of an accredited person working for a particular person. So Indian journalists are not, strictly speaking, his tribe, but he did run with them, so as to speak. Back to Levy.

 

·         Levy likely has done a great job – Editor has not read the book but you can tell from the interview he is very well informed. But that does not mean he understands how intelligence works. You never, ever, identify your agent to the intelligence of another country. It does not matter if that country is your BFF. This is not something you do. We won't go into the whys, we're just saying secrecy of your sources is paramount.

 

·         Nor did America "allow" Headley to go ahead to protect him for more important American purposes. From the Levy interview, it becomes apparent Headley was a source inside Pakistani terror groups and perhaps even Al Qaeda. Headley, it needs to say, was a rank opportunist of the worst kind. His sole purpose was to promote himself. He had a consistent record of doing things he shouldn't have, and when he got caught, of turning in everyone and offering to work as an informant. So everyone knew he was a DEA informant, but Editor at least did not know that he was allegedly working on the US's behalf by infiltrating Pakistani terror groups and so on.

 

·         Being the sort of person he is, Headley – it now appears – was not just reporting on the Mumbai plot. He was an active part of the plot, and one presumes he justified hanging around with all these unsavory terrorists by telling his handlers he needed to look authentic. After Mumbai – one assumes – the US realized what Headley was up to, arrested him and put away for a good long time. Headley, of course, betrayed everyone involved in the plot in America, including a childhood friend with whom he had plotted.

 

·         The question the Indians are not asking is: how would the US arresting Headley before anything happened have helped in stopping the plot? He was not crucial to the plan, beyond intellectual input and some scouting, the plan belonged to Pakistan ISI. So arresting him would not have stopped the attack. Moreover, it is in hindsight that America knew he was part of the plot. At that time he was a deep cover agent. So on what basis would America have arrested him? You do not arrest your own deep cover agents who presumably are risking their lives to get information to you. Even Indians should be able to see this makes zero sense.

 

·         The other question the Indians are not asking, because they plain are too scared to: when Indian intelligence had precise details, why was India unprepared for the attack? So much so that Indian authorities have said they were aware of something being up, but had no inkling the attack would come by sea. Sorry, folks. Levy makes clear the Americans said specifically the attackers would come by sea.

 

·         What Levy is saying, even if he does not mean to, that the Indians are guilty of criminal negligence and extreme dereliction of duty. The first is a criminal code offense; the second is a hanging offense. Moreover, something Editor at least had no clue. The Pakistanis had a mole inside India's Ministry of Defense that kept them informed on the modus of Indian Special Forces and how they would react. So which Indian official has been shot for allowing a mole to wreck havoc? No one. Was the mole found and shot? Indian intelligence does not arrest moles and prepare lengthy court cases. It merely finds out everything it can and shoots the mole/spy and the body is cremated with the family told "he was killed in a car accident". No one asks questions – if you know Indian intelligence, you would not either.

 

  • Does this mean Editor absolves the Americans of any responsibility for Headley? Of course not. He has written of this earlier and will again tomorrow. His grouse concerns America's behavior AFTER Headley was arrested. And not to ruin the update tomorrow, Editor makes clear America acted – after the arrest – in its own interests - as it should, and the Indians were too pathetic to do anything about it except whine.

CORRUPT PAKISTANI STATE DISMISSES DATA BASE CHIEF FOR BEING HONEST

$
0
0
From Col sami khan 





Tariq Malik's father Professor Fateh Muhammad Malik was my teacher! He belongs to village Tahi Dodial near Talagang Distt chakwal. A proud Awan!!
Sami





Wow High Court!



Let us treat this story a simple fiction!

MONITORING DESK ISLAMABAD - Central Information Secretary of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf, Dr. Shireen Mazari on Tuesday strongly condemned the removal of NADRA chief Tariq Malik by the government.
Mazari said that Tariq Malik was being penalised for exposing electoral fraud through NADRA data, especially thumb print verification. This action was yet another proof that there had been planned mass rigging in the 2013 General Election and post-elections, there was an equally large scale official cover up.
The Information Secretary said that PTI has been facing deliberate delays and hurdles in its petitions for thumb print verification by NADRA in the Punjab especially after rigging exposes in Sindh. Now the removal of the NADRA chief was further proof of the PMLN s efforts to conceal large scale electoral fraud engineered to bring it to power.
The very manner of the sacking, in the dark of night, has made it evident that there was male fide intent of covering up rigging, behind the action, Mazari added.
This action also shows the desperation of the PMLN government which now knows that the major electoral rigging that was engineered to bring it to power is already coming to light and the whole scheme of electoral fraud will stand exposed.
Today corruption and nepotism continue unabated with cronyism having signaled the death of merit, PTI s Information Secretary asserted. She demanded the government take back this vengeful action so that the credibility of NADRA is not destroyed as an institution.
"The sacking of Tariq Malik has sent a clear warning to all honest public servants that either they fall in line with corrupt practices or suffer the consequences", Mazari said.
Instead of rule of law and meritocracy the country is being governed like a private fiefdom with public servants being reduced to personal functionaries of the rulers thereby strengthening the cult of loyalties to rulers rather than to the state and nation, Mazari concluded. (Local TV)

 





SHAMELESS GOOD GOVERNANCE OF PML-N



Is this the good governance we'll have to live with??? CNU







 



Islamic Quilts don’t warm hearts-Islamic Extremist Charities being Thrust on Baloch Earthquake Affected Awaran while OXFAM told to get LOST

$
0
0
"I know that I am prejudiced on this matter, but I would be ashamed of myself if I were not."
Mark Twain
 

"A cynical, mercenary, demagogic press will produce in time a people as base as itself." - Joseph Pulitzer

    "Organized religion is like organized crime, it preys on people's weaknesses, generates huge profits for its operators and is almost impossible to eradicate" Mike Hermann

 

Quilts don't warm hearts

Thursday, 05 December 2013 14:15by Mir Mohammad Ali Talpur

While Rs 70m Oxfam project meant specifically for earthquake relief has been cancelled, Jamaat-ud-Dawa's Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF), Jamaat-i-Islami's Al-Khidmat and Jaish-e-Mohammad's Al Khair Trust are visible everywhere

Last week, the Punjab Chief Minister, Shahbaz Sharif, dispatched ten trucks loaded with quilts and shawls worth Rs 9.2 million from Lahore for earthquake-stricken areas of Baluchistan.
Talking to media he said that 30 thousand quilts and warm shawls costing Rs 92.4 million, as 90 more trucks laden with similar supplies, would be sent to the calamity-hit people from Rahim Yar Khan. He also said so far relief items worth Rs 200 million had been sent to earthquake victims of Balochistan under winter package while a sum of Rs 350 million had been deposited in the Prime Minister's Relief Fund. Everything here but so-called charity in particular is done in full glare of publicity lest some may not know how generously they help; they always mention the sums spent for relief which shows they care for the sum and not for the people. People like Shahbaz Sharif and his ilk will never understand that however warm and cosy the quilts maybe, they never warm the hearts hurt by the continued repression of Baloch for over sixty years now. 

  
Let's do some simple calculations here; even if two persons share a quilt or a blanket only some sixty thousand persons would get some relief because Balochistan winters are severe and unforgiving. National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) in a report revealed that a total of 46,756 houses were damaged in the recent earthquake in Balochistan of which 32,638 completely and 14,118 partially. Mind you earthquake's partially damaged houses too are not safe for living. Baloch have large families but if even for convenience sake we presume 7 members to a house the figure of affected people will number 327292 so these quilts like all other relief items are totally inadequate.


The dead number a thousand or more while the injured run into thousands but they are denied adequate medical help as even the medical camps run by Baloch Students Organization (BSO) Azad and the Balochistan National Movement (BNM) were forcibly dismantled when the army occupied Mashkay on the eve of Eid on October 16. Mahvish Ahmad has brilliantly narrated the incident. The Pakistani government determined to punish the people of Awaran and Kech for their support of Dr. Allah Nazar and Sarmachars has continued to deny them expert medical and material help from international agencies. 


Naziha Syed Ali Sahiba in an excellent and brave piece 'Fear & loathing in Awaran' (November 26th 2013, Dawn) says that according to locals since the earthquake struck large convoys of army and FC have been conducting raids on villages in the district, sealing off areas for house-to-house searches, picking up young men and releasing some unharmed after interrogation. She says the army has now established its presence in parts of Awaran district while earlier it could not venture beyond Awaran city military barracks. The independent Balochistan's tricolour flag has been replaced by the Pakistani flag in nearby villages and students of local schools made to relearn the national anthem which had long been forbidden. Moreover, army's increased and visible presence has reportedly driven nearly half the population to migrate from the area.


Ironically, according to Naziha Sahiba, since international organizations have been disallowed consequently Rs 70 million Oxfam funded project meant specifically for earthquake relief has been cancelled. Local NGOs say there are remote areas where even tents have not been delivered. She makes a disturbing revelation that establishment-favoured, faith-based charities have been given free rein to operate in the district. Graffiti on walls by Jamaat-ud-Dawa's Falah-i-Insaniyat Foundation (FIF), Jamaat-i-Islami's Al-Khidmat and Jaish-e-Mohammad's Al Khair Trust are visible everywhere. FIF's Black-and-white flags line the main street and JI's banners exhort the faithful to prayer in Awaran city. A FIF camp/madressah is under construction just outside of Awaran. She says no one vouched for the 'charities' doing any relief work in the area and overwhelming indications point to these having been injected into the landscape for the purpose of undermining an essentially secular insurgency.


It seems that Pakistani government has taken a leaf out from Israeli approach to the Negev desert Bedouins to deal with the Awaran district's people. The only difference for the present being that Israelis are forcing the Bedouins into settlements while beginning with Awaran the Pakistani establishment, making use of the devastating earthquake, wants to put Baloch people in settlements that they hope they will be able to control. The 'model town' that Nawaz Sharif had announced on his visit to Awaran is meant for the Negev Bedouin like resettlement. The establishment would give an arm and a leg if it could possibly restrict Baloch population to settlements where they could be strictly controlled and watched. Quilts and empty promises are no salve to the injuries that the Pakistani state has inflicted on Baloch people.


If quilts do not warm hearts then neither does the empty rhetoric which emanates from the Supreme Court (SC); so far 93 hearings have taken place but there has been absolutely no movement either towards recovery of Baloch missing persons or towards prosecution of even a low ranking personnel of the Frontier Corps. Brigadier Aurangzaib, Colonel Naeem, Major Tahir, Subedar Mominullah were among the 19 named by the Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Balochistan in the SC and were ordered to appear before the DIG for investigation but the order too proved to be a damp squib as the FC says these officers and men do not work for it so they cannot be produced.


Ironically the state which refused even to acknowledge that any Baloch person was missing until now heard from the horses' mouth, in this case the newly appointed Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, that 738, yes seven hundred and thirty eight, missing Baloch persons would be recovered before December 10th. No one is holding breath because nothing will happen. The presenting of 35 missing persons ordered by the SC hasn't been fruitful as ultimatums after ultimatum is futilely hurled at those who are responsible for the 'dirty war' against Baloch and others. The SC threats of action against the IGFC and others is an attempt to throw dust into peoples' eyes so that they may not see the real designs of establishment of which the SC too is a part. Baloch do not expect any sort of amelioration of their problems by Pakistan.


Tailpiece: All claims of making Balochistan a heaven on earth are as bogus as those who make these promises. The teachers and non-teaching staff of Balochistan University after protesting for three weeks at the main gate of campus came out on streets with begging bowls in hands; they haven't been paid salaries for some time; needless to say that the middle class chief minister had claimed a phenomenal increase in education budget. Ironically Daily "Intekhab' reports that Muhammad Khan Achakzai, Governor Balochistan, has promised Rs. 5 million donation to his former alma mater the Forman Christian College. It is a calculated policy to ensure that Baloch remain deprived of education and Sardars be blamed for all the sins of omission and commission that establishment commits. If anything like conscience existed here the provincial government and the central government would have resigned for the lies they tell and the charades they perpetuate but then living by conscience is an alien concept here.

Mir Muhammad Ali Talpur has an association with the Baloch rights movement going back to the early 1970s. He tweets at mmatalpur and can be contacted at mmatalpur@gmail.com

God's Battalions: The Case for the Crusades by Rodney Stark. Book Review

سرمائے کا زوال مسلسل

$
0
0


--
In Defence of Marxism
  Thursday, 5 December 2013About us     Contact us     Join us  

By Diego M Macías Woitrin

20130911-CNTE Megamarcha-Eneas De Troya-thSince late July 2013, an important and radical sector of Mexican's National Teachers Union has staged massive protests and called for a sectorial strike that, even if many times interrupted and not followed by the majority of the Trade Union, has shaken the ground in the country.


By Liza R. and Jose Manuel

In the past two centuries, humankind has seen the development of our productive forces to a level previously undreamt of. What was once unimaginable is now commonplace. Never have we been so technologically advanced, never have we had such capability, never has there been such raw potential.


By Peter Mikhailenko

The "New Trade Unions and the Democratic Left: Historical Roots and Ideological Landmarks" conference occurred November 2-3 in Kiev. The conference brought together around 200 trade unionists, activists and academics for the two day event, mostly from Ukraine and the former USSR. The organizers of the conference included the Confederation of Free Trade Unions of Ukraine (KVPU), the Russian Confederation of Labour (KTR), the Belorussian Congress of Democratic Trade Unions (BKDP), the Confederation of Trade Unions of Georgia (KPG), the social critique magazine Spilne (Спiльне), the Global Labour Institute/the Praxis Centre, the International Memorial and the workshop "Russian Left in History and in Modern Times".

 
 ESPAÑOL
By Marie Frederiksen

Presentamos a continuación una transcripción de la introducción al debate sobre el Marxismo y la Mujer de la pasada Escuela Mundial de Formación Política de la Corriente Marxista Internacional que se realizó en Atenas, Grecia, el verano pasado. La exposición inicial estuvo a cargo de la camarada Marie Frederiksen, editora de Socialistisk Standpunkt, el periódico marxista danés.


 OTHER LANGUAGES
By Adam Booth

Já se observou em diversas ocasiões que os analistas burgueses sérios frequentemente chegam às mesmas conclusões que os marxistas, embora com um ligeiro atraso. Esta ideia nunca ficou mais evidente do que em um artigo recente de Paul Krugman, o economista que ganhou o Prêmio Nobel, intitulado "Uma Recessão Permanente".


By The Struggle (Pakistan)

بجلی، پٹرولیم اور اشیائے خوردو نوش کی قیمتوں میں ہوشربا اضافے کے بعد شاید کوئی کسر باقی رہ گئی تھی کہ اب دوا ساز کمپنیوں کی ''پرزور فرمائش''پر ادویات کی قیمتوں میں بھی اضافہ کیا جارہا ہے۔ پاکستان میں ادویات اور علاج معالجے کی سہولیات عام آدمی کی پہنچ سے پہلے ہی باہر ہیں۔ مسلم لیگ کی حکومت ہر چیز کی قیمت میں اضافہ کررہی ہے۔ سرمایہ داروں اور جاگیرداروں کے منافعے اور اثاثے تیزی سے بڑھ رہے ہیں جبکہ محنت کشوں کی اجرتیں اور غریب عوام کی آمدن میں اضافے کی بجائے کمی ہورہی ہے۔


If you want to be removed from this list send a message to news-unsubscribe@marxistmail.com
"In Defence of Marxism" web site, PO Box 50525, London, E14 6WG, Britain
editor@marxist.comwww.marxist.com




US Analysts like Mark Mazetti are Exaggerating Pakistani Reactions and Roles

$
0
0

US Analysts like Mark Mazetti are Exaggerating Pakistani Reactions and Roles


Agha H Amin


Why I Dont Agree with MARK MAZZETTI's BU____l SH____T ANALYSIS OF RAYMOND DAVIS

Why I Dont Agree with MARK MAZZETTI's BU____l   SH____T  ANALYSIS OF RAYMOND DAVIS

MY OWN ANALYSIS OF THIRD RATE HISTORY OF THIS AREA IS APPENDED BELOW MAZZETTIS ASSORTED PEARLS OF ABSOLUTE BULL SHIT.THIS ANALYSIS WAS DONE ON EVE OF US ATTACK ON AFGHANISTAN

AGHA .H.AMIN

Mark Mazzetti's analysis is not based on facts.

The hard facts of the matter are that historically the region that comprises Pakistan consists of the most opportunist races in the world .

In 1857 it was thanks to these opportunist races that 5th and 8th Light Cavalry were disbanded by the English East India Company ?

Some my ancestors and their cousins served in these fine cavalry regiments.

Pakistani Muslims in particular and Indian Muslims in general were saved from total political annihilation at hands of Sikhs and Hindus by a KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOUR called ENGLISH EAST INDIA COMPANY WHO liberated Delhi and UP Muslims from Hindu Marathas in 1803 and Punjabi and Pashtun Muslims from Sikhs in 1849.Sindhi Muslims by Treaty of Amritsrar in 1809.

ITS A HARD FACT OF HISTORY THAT A 8 % SIKH MINORITY HAD ABSOLUTELY DEFEATED MUSLIMS BOTH SIKH AND PASHTUNS AND USED MUSLIM MOSQUES AS STABLES.

THESE SIKHS WOULD HAVE DESTROYED SINDH TOO BUT WERE RESTRAINED BY TREARY OF AMRITSRAR OF 1809.

It was US largesse that saved Pakistan in the period 1954-66 and 1979- 2001 Afghan Wars.

Anti Americanism in PAKISTAN is a ploy to get US aid .

THE RULE OF THUMB WITH PAKISTANI ELITE IS SIMPLE AND WELL TRIED BY ALL RACES FROM TURKS TO BRITISH :--


" YOU FU____K  THEIR MOTHERS AND THEY ACKNOWLEDGE YOU AS THEIR FATHER " !

RUMSFELD COULD HAVE ACHIEVED MUCH MORE AND AT A FAR LOWER COST FFROM MUSHARRAF IN LATE 2001 BY DESTROYING AERIALLY FEW PARTS OF ISLAMABAD ?

PAKISTANI ELITE BOTH MILITARY AND CIVILIAN ARE HOPELESS WINDBAGS FULL OF ROTTEN MANURE !

ABOSLUTELY SPINELESS ?

MANY BATMEN OF BRITISH OFFICERS WERE COMMISSIONED IN OFFICER RANKS IN PAKISTAN ARMY AND AT LEAST THREE BECAME GENERALS.

I ASKED MY QUARTER MASTER WHO HAD SERVED IN THE ISI AND HE HAD A VERY LOW AND DESPICABLE OPINION ABOUT THE ISI WHO HE SAID WAS FULL OF NAUKRI BAAZ PEOPLE ( CAREERISTS AND SYCOPHANTS)

SO I DONT AGREE WITH MAZEOTTIS BULL SHIT .

PAKISTAN MOST DANGEROUS ENEMIES ARE THE 20,000 FAMILIES OWNING 80 % OF WEALTH AND PAYING 5 % TAXES,

PAKISTANI POLITICIANS GENERALS AND PROSTITUTES PERFORM UMRAH IN SAUDI OCCUPIED ARABIA EVERY RAMZAN TO WHITE WASH THEIR PROMISCUITY ?

PAKISTAN IS IN ANARCHY THANKS TO ITS PIM___ LEADERS ?

WHAT IS ANTI AMERICANISM  ? PAKISTANIS ARE FED UP WITH THEIR OWN LEADERS WHO ARE WORSE THAN US OR JEWS OR HINDUS ?
AGHA H AMIN


HOW A SINGLE SPY HELPED TURN PAKISTAN AGAINST THE UNITED STATES


Photo illustration from photographs by Arif Ali/AFP, via Newscom (left) and Douglas County sheriff's office (right).
By 

Published: April 9, 2013 256 Comments
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • GOOGLE+
  • SAVE
  • E-MAIL
  • SHARE
  • PRINT
  • REPRINTS
The burly American was escorted by Pakistani policemen into a crowded interrogation room. Amid a clatter of ringing mobile phones and cross talk among the cops speaking a mishmash of Urdu, Punjabi and English, the investigator tried to decipher the facts of the case.
Tariq Saeed/Reuters
Raymond Davis, who was employed by the C.I.A. as a contractor, was escorted out of court after facing a judge in Lahore, January 28, 2011.
Ilyas J. Dean/PAK/Newscom
Pakistani rage at the United States — in particular at the drone attacks in the tribal areas — found focus with the Raymond Davis affair.
K.M. Chaudary/Associated Press
An armored car carrying Raymond Davis leaves a courthouse in Lahore, Pakistan.

Readers' Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
"America, you from America?"
"Yes."
"You're from America, and you belong to the American Embassy?"
"Yes," the American voice said loudly above the chatter. "My passport — at the site I showed the police officer. . . . It's somewhere. It's lost."
On the jumpy video footage of the interrogation, he reached beneath his checkered flannel shirt and produced a jumble of identification badges hanging around his neck. "This is an old badge. This is Islamabad." He showed the badge to the man across the desk and then flipped to a more recent one proving his employment in the American Consulate in Lahore.
"You are working at the consulate general in Lahore?" the policeman asked.
"Yes."
"As a . . . ?"
"I, I just work as a consultant there."
"Consultant?" The man behind the desk paused for a moment and then shot a question in Urdu to another policeman. "And what's the name?"
"Raymond Davis," the officer responded.
"Raymond Davis," the American confirmed. "Can I sit down?"
"Please do. Give you water?" the officer asked.
"Do you have a bottle? A bottle of water?" Davis asked.
Another officer in the room laughed. "You want water?" he asked. "No money, no water."
Another policeman walked into the room and asked for an update. "Is he understanding everything? And he just killed two men?"
Hours earlier, Davis had been navigating dense traffic in Lahore, his thick frame wedged into the driver's seat of a white Honda Civic. A city once ruled by Mughals, Sikhs and the British, Lahore is Pakistan's cultural and intellectual capital, and for nearly a decade it had been on the fringes of America's secret war in Pakistan. But the map of Islamic militancy inside Pakistan had been redrawn in recent years, and factions that once had little contact with one another had cemented new alliances in response to the C.I.A.'s drone campaign in the western mountains. Groups that had focused most of their energies dreaming up bloody attacks against India were now aligning themselves closer to Al Qaeda and other organizations with a thirst for global jihad. Some of these groups had deep roots in Lahore, which was why Davis and a C.I.A. team set up operations from a safe house in the city.
But now Davis was sitting in a Lahore police station, having shot two young men who approached his car on a black motorcycle, their guns drawn, at an intersection congested with cars, bicycles and rickshaws. Davis took his semiautomatic Glock pistol and shot through the windshield, shattering the glass and hitting one of the men numerous times. As the other man fled, Davis got out of his car and shot several rounds into his back.
He radioed the American Consulate for help, and within minutes a Toyota Land Cruiser was in sight, careering in the wrong direction down a one-way street. But the S.U.V. struck and killed a young Pakistani motorcyclist and then drove away. An assortment of bizarre paraphernalia was found, including a black mask, approximately 100 bullets and a piece of cloth bearing an American flag. The camera inside Davis's car contained photos of Pakistani military installations, taken surreptitiously.
More than two years later, the Raymond Davis episode has been largely forgotten in the United States. It was immediately overshadowed by the dramatic raid months later that killed Osama bin Laden — consigned to a footnote in the doleful narrative of America's relationship with Pakistan. But dozens of interviews conducted over several months, with government officials and intelligence officers in Pakistan and in the United States, tell a different story: that the real unraveling of the relationship was set off by the flurry of bullets Davis unleashed on the afternoon of Jan. 27, 2011, and exacerbated by a series of misguided decisions in the days and weeks that followed. In Pakistan, it is the Davis affair, more than the Bin Laden raid, that is still discussed in the country's crowded bazaars and corridors of power.
Davis was taken to Kot Lakhpat prison, on the industrial fringes of Lahore, a jail with a reputation for inmates dying under murky circumstances. He was separated from the rest of the prisoners and held in a section of the decaying facility where the guards didn't carry weapons, a concession for his safety that American officials managed to extract from the prison staff. The United States Consulate in Lahore had negotiated another safeguard: A small team of dogs was tasting Davis's food, checking that it had not been laced with poison.
For many senior Pakistani spies, the man sitting in the jail cell represented solid proof of their suspicions that the C.I.A. had sent a vast secret army to Pakistan, men who sowed chaos and violence as part of the covert American war in the country. For the C.I.A., the eventual disclosure of Davis's role with the agency shed an unflattering light on a post–Sept. 11 reality: that the C.I.A. had farmed out some of its most sensitive jobs to outside contractors — many of them with neither the experience nor the temperament to work in the war zones of the Islamic world.
The third child of a bricklayer and a cook, Davis grew up in a small clapboard house outside Big Stone Gap, a town of nearly 6,000 people in Virginia coal country. He became a football and wrestling star at the local high school, and after graduating in 1993, Davis enlisted in the Army and did a tour in Macedonia in 1994 as a United Nations peacekeeper. When his five-year hitch in the infantry was up, he re-enlisted, this time in the Army's Third Special Forces Group based at Fort Bragg, N.C. He left the Army in 2003 and, like hundreds of other retired Navy SEALs and Green Berets, was hired by the private security firm Blackwater and soon found himself in Iraq working security for the C.I.A.
Little is known about his work for Blackwater, but by 2006, Davis had left the firm and, together with his wife, founded a security company in Las Vegas. Soon he was hired by the C.I.A. as a private contractor, what the agency calls a "Green Badge," for the color of the identification cards that contractors show to enter C.I.A. headquarters at Langley. Like Davis, many of the contractors were hired to fill out the C.I.A.'s Global Response Staff — bodyguards who traveled to war zones to protect case officers, assess the security of potential meeting spots, even make initial contact with sources to ensure that case officers wouldn't be walking into an ambush. Officers from the C.I.A.'s security branch came under withering fire on the roof of the agency's base in Benghazi, Libya, last September. The demands of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had so stretched the C.I.A.'s own cadre of security officers that the agency was forced to pay inflated sums to private contractors to do the security jobs. When Davis first deployed with the C.I.A. to Pakistan in 2008, he worked from the agency's base in Peshawar, earning upward of $200,000 a year.
By mid-February 2011, with Davis still sitting in prison, anti-American passions were fully inflamed, and daily street protests and newspaper editorials demanded that the government not cave to Washington's demands for Davis's release but instead sentence him to death. The evidence at the time indicated that the men Davis killed had carried out a string of petty thefts that day, but there was an added problem: the third man killed by the unmarked American S.U.V. fleeing the scene. Making matters even worse for Davis was the fact that he was imprisoned in Lahore, where the family of Nawaz Sharif dominated the political culture. The former leader of the country made no secret about his intentions to once again run Pakistan, making him the chief antagonist to President Asif Ali Zardari and his political machine in Islamabad, a four-hour drive away. As the American Embassy in Islamabad leaned on Zardari's government to get Davis released from jail, the diplomats soon realized that Zardari had little influence over the police officers and judges in the city of the president's bitter rival.
But the most significant factor ensuring that Davis would languish in jail was that the Obama administration had yet to tell Pakistan's government what the Pakistanis already suspected, and what Raymond Davis's marksmanship made clear: He wasn't just another paper-shuffling American diplomat. Davis's work in Pakistan was much darker, and it involved probing an exposed nerve in the already-hypersensitive relationship between the C.I.A. and Pakistan's military intelligence service, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, or I.S.I.
Ever since the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (the Army of the Pure) dispatched teams of assassins to lay siege to luxury hotels and other sites in Mumbai, India, in November 2008, killing and wounding more than 500 people over four days of mayhem, C.I.A. analysts had been warning that the group was seeking to raise its global profile by carrying out spectacular attacks beyond South Asia. This spurred the agency to assign more of its expanding army of operatives in Pakistan toward gathering intelligence about Lashkar's operations — a decision that put the interests of the C.I.A. and the I.S.I. in direct conflict. It was one thing for American spies to be lurking around the tribal areas, hunting for Al Qaeda figures; it was quite another to go into Pakistani cities on espionage missions against a group that the I.S.I. considered a valuable proxy force in its continuing battle with India.
The I.S.I. had nurtured the group for years as a useful asset against India, and Lashkar's sprawling headquarters outside Lahore housed a radical madrassa, a market, a hospital, even a fish farm. The group's charismatic leader, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, had been put under house arrest at various times, but in 2009 the Lahore High Court quashed all terrorism charges against him and set him free. A stocky man with a wild beard, Saeed preached out in the open on many Fridays, flanked by bodyguards and delivering sermons to throngs of his followers about the imperialism of the United States, India and Israel. Even after the U.S. offered a $10 million reward for evidence linking Saeed to the Mumbai attacks, he continued to move freely in public, burnishing his legend as a Pakistani version of Robin Hood.
By the time Raymond Davis moved into a safe house with a handful of other C.I.A. officers and contractors in late 2010, the bulk of the agency's officers in Lahore were focused on investigating the growth of Lashkar. To get more of its spies into Pakistan, the C.I.A. had exploited the arcane rules in place for approving visas for Americans. The State Department, the C.I.A. and the Pentagon all had separate channels to request visas for their personnel, and all of them led to the desk of Husain Haqqani, Pakistan's pro-American ambassador in Washington. Haqqani had orders from Islamabad to be lenient in approving the visas, because many of the Americans coming to Pakistan were — at least officially — going to be administering millions of dollars in foreign-aid money. By the time of the Lahore killings, in early 2011, so many Americans were operating inside Pakistan under both legitimate and false identities that even the U.S. Embassy didn't have accurate records of their identities and whereabouts.
The American Embassy in Islamabad is essentially a fortress within a fortress, a pile of buildings enclosed by walls topped with razor wire and surveillance cameras and then encircled by an outer ring of walls that separates a leafy area, called the Diplomatic Enclave, from the rest of the city. Inside the embassy, the work of diplomats and spies is kept largely separate, with the C.I.A. station occupying a warren of offices in its own wing, accessed only through doors with coded locks.
After Davis was picked up by the Lahore police, the embassy became a house divided by more than mere geography. Just days before the shootings, the C.I.A. sent a new station chief to Islamabad. Old-school and stubborn, the new chief did not come to Pakistan to be friendly with the I.S.I. Instead, he wanted to recruit more Pakistani agents to work for the C.I.A. under the I.S.I.'s nose, expand electronic surveillance of I.S.I. offices and share little information with Pakistani intelligence officers.
That hard-nosed attitude inevitably put him at odds with the American ambassador in Islamabad, Cameron Munter. A bookish career diplomat with a Ph.D. in history, Munter had ascended the ranks of the State Department's bureaucracy and accepted several postings in Iraq before ultimately taking over the American mission in Islamabad, in late 2010. The job was considered one of the State Department's most important and difficult assignments, and Munter had the burden of following Anne W. Patterson, an aggressive diplomat who, in the three years before Munter arrived, cultivated close ties to officials in the Bush and Obama administrations and won praise from the C.I.A. for her unflinching support for drone strikes in the tribal areas.
Munter saw some value to the drone program but was skeptical about the long-term benefits. Arriving in Islamabad at a time when relations between the United States and Pakistan were quickly deteriorating, Munter wondered whether the pace of the drone war might be undercutting relations with an important ally for the quick fix of killing midlevel terrorists. He would learn soon enough that his views about the drone program ultimately mattered little. In the Obama administration, when it came to questions about war and peace in Pakistan, it was what the C.I.A. believed that really counted.
With Davis sitting in prison, Munter argued that it was essential to go immediately to the head of the I.S.I. at the time, Lt. Gen. Ahmad Shuja Pasha, to cut a deal. The U.S. would admit that Davis was working for the C.I.A., and Davis would quietly be spirited out of the country, never to return again. But the C.I.A. objected. Davis had been spying on a militant group with extensive ties to the I.S.I., and the C.I.A. didn't want to own up to it. Top C.I.A. officials worried that appealing for mercy from the I.S.I. might doom Davis. He could be killed in prison before the Obama administration could pressure Islamabad to release him on the grounds that he was a foreign diplomat with immunity from local laws — even those prohibiting murder. On the day of Davis's arrest, the C.I.A. station chief told Munter that a decision had been made to stonewall the Pakistanis. Don't cut a deal, he warned, adding, Pakistan is the enemy.
The strategy meant that American officials, from top to bottom, had to dissemble both in public and in private about what exactly Davis had been doing in the country. On Feb. 15, more than two weeks after the shootings, President Obama offered his first comments about the Davis affair. The matter was simple, Obama said in a news conference: Davis, "our diplomat in Pakistan," should be immediately released under the "very simple principle" of diplomatic immunity. "If our diplomats are in another country," said the president, "then they are not subject to that country's local prosecution."
Calling Davis a "diplomat" was, technically, accurate. He had been admitted into Pakistan on a diplomatic passport. But there was a dispute about whether his work in the Lahore Consulate, as opposed to the American Embassy in Islamabad, gave him full diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. And after the shootings in Lahore, the Pakistanis were not exactly receptive to debating the finer points of international law. As they saw it, Davis was an American spy who had not been declared to the I.S.I. and whom C.I.A. officials still would not admit they controlled. General Pasha, the I.S.I. chief, spoke privately by phone and in person with Leon Panetta, then the director of the C.I.A., to get more information about the matter. He suspected that Davis was a C.I.A. employee and suggested to Panetta that the two spy agencies handle the matter quietly. Meeting with Panetta, he posed a direct question.
Was Davis working for the C.I.A.? Pasha asked. No, he's not one of ours, Panetta replied. Panetta went on to say that the matter was out of his hands, and that the issue was being handled inside State Department channels. Pasha was furious, and he decided to leave Davis's fate in the hands of the judges in Lahore. The United States had just lost its chance, he told others, to quickly end the dispute.
That the C.I.A. director would be overseeing a large clandestine network of American spies in Pakistan and then lie to the I.S.I. director about the extent of America's secret war in the country showed just how much the relationship had unraveled since the days in 2002, when the I.S.I. teamed with the C.I.A. in Peshawar to hunt for Osama bin Laden in western Pakistan. Where had it gone so wrong?
While the spy agencies had had a fraught relationship since the beginning of the Afghan war, the first major breach came in July 2008, when C.I.A. officers in Islamabad paid a visit to Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, the Pakistani Army chief, to tell him that President Bush had signed off on a set of secret orders authorizing a new strategy in the drone wars. No longer would the C.I.A. give Pakistan advance warning before launching missiles from Predator or Reaper drones in the tribal areas. From that point on, the C.I.A. officers told Kayani, the C.I.A.'s killing campaign in Pakistan would be a unilateral war.
The decision had been made in Washington after months of wrenching debate about the growth of militancy in Pakistan's tribal areas; a highly classified C.I.A. internal memo, dated May 1, 2007, concluded that Al Qaeda was at its most dangerous since 2001 because of the base of operations that militants had established in the tribal areas. That assessment became the cornerstone of a yearlong discussion about the Pakistan problem. Some experts in the State Department warned that expanding the C.I.A. war in Pakistan would further stoke anti-American anger on the streets and could push the country into chaos. But officials inside the C.I.A.'s Counterterrorism Center argued for escalating the drone campaign without the I.S.I.'s blessing. Since the first C.I.A. drone strike in Pakistan in 2004, only a small number of militants on the C.I.A.'s list of "high-value targets" had been killed by drone strikes, and other potential strikes were scuttled at the last minute because of delays in getting Pakistani approval, or because the targets seemed to have been tipped off and had fled.
So, in July 2008, when the C.I.A.'s director, Michael Hayden, and his deputy, Stephen Kappes, came to the White House to present the agency's plan to wage a unilateral war in the mountains of Pakistan, it wasn't a hard sell to a frustrated president. That began the relentless, years-long drone assault on the tribal areas that President Obama continued when he took office. And as the C.I.A.'s relationship with the I.S.I. soured, Langley sent station chiefs out to Islamabad who spent far less time and energy building up good will with Pakistani spies than their predecessors had. From 2008 on, the agency cycled a succession of seasoned case officers through Islamabad, and each left Pakistan more embittered than the last. One of them had to leave the country in haste when his identity was revealed in the Pakistani press. The C.I.A. suspected the leak came from the I.S.I.
Even many of the operations that at first seemed likely to signal a new era of cooperation between the C.I.A. and the I.S.I. ended in recriminations and finger-pointing. In January 2010, a clandestine team of C.I.A. officers and American special-operations troops working in Karachi traced a cellphone to a house in Baldia Town, a slum in the western part of the sprawling city. The C.I.A. did not conduct unilateral operations inside large Pakistani cities, so the Americans notified the I.S.I. about the intelligence. Pakistani troops and policemen launched a surprise raid on the house.
Although the C.I.A. didn't know in advance, hiding inside the house was Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, a man considered to be the Afghan Taliban's military commander and the second in command to Mullah Muhammad Omar, the leader of the Taliban. Only after suspects in the house were arrested and questioned did the C.I.A. learn that Baradar was among the detainees. The I.S.I. took him to a detention facility in an industrial section of Islamabad and refused the C.I.A. access to him. "At that point, things got really complicated," one former C.I.A. officer said.
Was the entire episode a setup? Rumors had circulated inside Pakistan that Baradar wanted to cut a deal with the Americans and bring the Taliban to the negotiating table in Afghanistan. Had the I.S.I. somehow engineered the entire arrest, feeding intelligence to the C.I.A. so that Baradar could be taken off the street and the nascent peace talks spoiled? Had the I.S.I. played the C.I.A.? Months later, senior C.I.A. officials at Langley still couldn't answer those questions. Today, more than three years later, Mullah Baradar remains in Pakistani custody.
As Davis languished in the jail cell in Lahore, the C.I.A. was pursuing its most promising lead about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden since 2001, when he escaped from Tora Bora, in Afghanistan, and fled across the border into Pakistan. A small group of officers inside the agency's Counterterrorism Center had become convinced that Bin Laden was hiding in a large compound in Abbottabad, a quiet hamlet north of Islamabad. For months, Panetta had been pushing clandestine officers to find a shred of hard proof that Bin Laden was hiding in the compound. The intelligence-gathering operating in Abbottabad had become the highest priority for the C.I.A. in Pakistan.
It was therefore more than a bit inconvenient that one of its undercover officers was sitting in a jail in Lahore facing a double murder charge. Pakistan's Islamist parties organized street protests and threatened violent riots if Raymond Davis was not tried and hanged for his crimes. American diplomats in Lahore regularly visited Davis, but the Obama administration continued to stonewall Pakistan's government about the nature of Davis's work in the country.
And then the episode claimed another victim. On Feb. 6, the grieving widow of one of Davis's victims swallowed a lethal amount of rat poison and was rushed to the hospital in Faisalabad, where doctors pumped her stomach. The woman, Shumaila Faheem, was certain that the United States and Pakistan would quietly broker a deal to release her husband's killer from prison, a view she expressed to her doctors from her hospital bed. "They are already treating my husband's murderer like a V.I.P. in police custody, and I am sure they will let him go because of international pressure," she said. She died shortly afterward and instantly became a martyr for anti-American groups inside Pakistan.
The furor over the Davis incident was quickly escalating, threatening to shut down most C.I.A. operations in the country and derail the intelligence-gathering operation in Abbottabad. But the C.I.A. stood firm and sent top officials to Islamabad, who told Ambassador Munter to stick to the strategy.
By then, though, Munter had decided that the C.I.A.'s strategy wasn't working, and eventually even high-level officials in the agency began to realize that stonewalling the Pakistanis was only causing the I.S.I. to dig in. After discussions among White House, State Department and C.I.A. officials in Washington, Munter approached General Pasha, the I.S.I. chief, and came clean. Davis was with the C.I.A., he said, and the United States needed to get him out of the country as quickly as possible. Pasha was fuming that Leon Panetta had lied to him, and he was going to make the Americans squirm by letting Davis sit in jail while he considered — on his own timetable — the best way to resolve the situation.
Back in Washington, Ambassador Haqqani was summoned to C.I.A. headquarters on Feb. 21 and taken into Panetta's spacious office overlooking the agency's campus in Langley, Va. Sitting around a large conference table, Panetta asked Haqqani for his help securing Davis's release.
"If you're going to send a Jason Bourne character to Pakistan, he should have the skills of a Jason Bourne to get away," Haqqani shot back, according to one person who attended the meeting.
More than a week later, General Pasha came back to Ambassador Munter to discuss a new strategy. It was a solution based on an ancient tradition that would allow the matter to be settled outside the unpredictable court system. The issue had already been discussed among a number of Pakistani and American officials, including Ambassador Haqqani in Washington. The reckoning for Davis's actions would come in the form of "blood money," or diyat, a custom under Shariah law that compensates the families of victims for their dead relatives. The matter would be handled quietly, and Davis would be released from jail.
Pasha ordered I.S.I. operatives in Lahore to meet the families of the three men killed during the January episode and negotiate a settlement. Some of the relatives initially resisted, but the I.S.I. negotiators were not about to let the talks collapse. After weeks of discussions, the parties agreed on a total of 200 million Pakistani rupees, approximately $2.34 million, to offer "forgiveness" to the jailed C.I.A. officer.
Only a small group of Obama administration officials knew of the talks, and as they dragged on, Lahore's high court was preparing to rule on whether Davis would be granted diplomatic immunity, a decision the C.I.A. expected to go against the United States and worried might set a precedent for future cases in Pakistan.
Davis remained in the dark about all of this. When he arrived for his court appearance on March 16, he was fully expecting to hear that the trial would proceed and that the judge would issue a new court date. He was escorted into the courtroom, his wrists cuffed in front of him, and locked inside an iron cage near the judge's bench. According to one person's account, General Pasha sat in the back of the courtroom, his cellphone out. He began sending out a stream of nervous text messages to Ambassador Munter, updating him about the court proceedings. Pasha was one of the most powerful men in Pakistan, and yet the I.S.I. had little control over the mercurial courts in Lahore, and he wasn't entirely sure that things would proceed according to plan.
The first part of the hearing went as everyone expected. The judge, saying that the case would go ahead, noted that his ruling on diplomatic immunity would come in a matter of days. Pakistani reporters frantically began filing their stories about how this seemed a blow to the American case, and that it appeared that Davis would not be released from jail anytime soon. But then the judge ordered the courtroom cleared, and General Pasha's secret plan unfolded.
Through a side entrance, 18 relatives of the victims walked into the room, and the judge announced that the civil court had switched to a Shariah court. Each of the family members approached Davis, some of them with tears in their eyes or sobbing outright, and announced that he or she forgave him. Pasha sent another text message to Munter: The matter was settled. Davis was a free man. In a Lahore courtroom, the laws of God had trumped the laws of man.
The drama played out entirely in Urdu, and throughout the proceeding, a baffled Davis sat silently inside the cage. He was even more stunned when I.S.I. operatives whisked him out of the courthouse through a back entrance and pushed him into a waiting car that sped to the Lahore airport.
The move had been choreographed to get Davis out of the country as quickly as possible. American officials, including Munter, were waiting for Davis at the airport, and some began to worry. Davis had, after all, already shot dead two men he believed were threatening him. If he thought he was being taken away to be killed, he might try to make an escape, even try to kill the I.S.I. operatives inside the car. When the car arrived at the airport and pulled up to the plane ready to take Davis out of Pakistan, the C.I.A. operative was in a daze. It appeared to the Americans waiting for him that Davis realized only then that he was safe.
The Davis affair led Langley to order dozens of covert officers out of Pakistan in the hope of lowering the temperature in the C.I.A. – I.S.I. relationship. Ambassador Munter issued a public statement shortly after the bizarre court proceeding, saying he was "grateful for the generosity" of the families and expressing regret for the entire incident and the "suffering it caused."
But the secret deal only fueled the anger in Pakistan, and anti-American protests flared in major cities, including Islamabad, Karachi and Lahore. Demonstrators set tires ablaze, clashed with Pakistani riot police and brandished placards with slogans like "I Am Raymond Davis, Give Me a Break, I Am Just a C.I.A. Hit Man."
The entire episode — and bin Laden's killing in Abbottabad later that spring — extinguished any lingering productive relations between the United States and Pakistan. Leon Panetta's relationship with General Pasha, the I.S.I. chief, was poisoned, and the already small number of Obama officials pushing for better relations between Washington and Islamabad dwindled even further. Munter was reporting daily back to Washington about the negative impact of the armed-drone campaign and about how the C.I.A. seemed to be conducting a war in a vacuum, oblivious to the ramifications that the drone strikes were having on American relations with Pakistan's government.
The C.I.A. had approval from the White House to carry out missile strikes in Pakistan even when the agency's targeters weren't certain about exactly whom they were killing. Under the rules of so-called "signature strikes," decisions about whether to fire missiles from drones could be made based on patterns of activity deemed suspicious. For instance, if a group of young "military-age males" were observed moving in and out of a suspected militant training camp and were thought to be carrying weapons, they could be considered legitimate targets. American officials admit it is nearly impossible to judge a person's age from thousands of feet in the air, and in Pakistan's tribal areas, adolescent boys are often among militant fighters. Using such broad definitions to determine who was a "combatant" and therefore a legitimate target allowed Obama administration officials at one point to claim that the escalation of drone strikes in Pakistan had not killed any civilians for a year. It was something of a trick of logic: in an area of known militant activity, all military-age males could be considered enemy fighters. Therefore, anyone who was killed in a drone strike there was categorized as a combatant.
The perils of this approach were laid bare on March 17, 2011, the day after Davis was released from prison and spirited out of the country. C.I.A. drones attacked a tribal council meeting in the village of Datta Khel, in North Waziristan, killing dozens of men. Ambassador Munter and some at the Pentagon thought the timing of the strike was disastrous, and some American officials suspected that the massive strike was the C.I.A. venting its anger about the Davis episode. More important, however, many American officials believed that the strike was botched, and that dozens of people died who shouldn't have.
Other American officials came to the C.I.A.'s defense, saying that the tribal gathering was in fact a meeting of senior militants and therefore a legitimate target. But the drone strike unleashed a furious response in Pakistan, and street protests in Lahore, Karachi and Peshawar forced the temporary closure of American consulates in those cities.
Munter said he believed that the C.I.A. was being reckless and that his position as ambassador was becoming untenable. His relationship with the C.I.A. station chief in Islamabad, already strained because of their disagreements over the handling of the Davis case, deteriorated even further when Munter demanded that the C.I.A. give him the chance to call off specific missile strikes. During one screaming match between the two men, Munter tried to make sure the station chief knew who was in charge, only to be reminded of who really held the power in Pakistan.
"You're not the ambassador!" Munter shouted.
"You're right, and I don't want to be the ambassador," the station chief replied.
This turf battle spread to Washington, and a month after Bin Laden was killed, President Obama's top advisers were arguing in a National Security Council meeting over who really was in charge in Pakistan. At the June 2011 meeting, Munter, who participated via secure video link, began making his case that he should have veto power over specific drone strikes.
Panetta cut Munter off, telling him that the C.I.A. had the authority to do what it wanted in Pakistan. It didn't need to get the ambassador's approval for anything.
"I don't work for you," Panetta told Munter, according to several people at the meeting.
But Secretary of State Hillary Clinton came to Munter's defense. She turned to Panetta and told him that he was wrong to assume he could steamroll the ambassador and launch strikes against his approval.
"No, Hillary," Panetta said, "it's you who are flat wrong."
There was a stunned silence, and National Security Adviser Tom Donilon tried to regain control of the meeting. In the weeks that followed, Donilon brokered a compromise of sorts: Munter would be allowed to object to specific drone strikes, but the C.I.A. could still press its case to the White House and get approval for strikes even over the ambassador's objections. Obama's C.I.A. had, in essence, won yet again.
As for Raymond Davis, he tried to settle back into his life in the United States after being flown out of Pakistan. He found work as a firearms instructor, but in the end he couldn't stay out of trouble. On Oct. 1, 2011, just seven months after his abrupt departure from Pakistan, Davis was eyeing a parking spot in front of a bagel shop in Highlands Ranch, Colo., a suburb of Denver. So was Jeffrey Maes, a 50-year-old minister who was driving with his wife and two young daughters. When Maes beat Davis to the spot, Davis shouted profanities through his open window. Then he jumped out of his car and confronted Maes, telling the minister that he had been waiting for the parking spot.
According to an affidavit given by Maes, he told Davis to "relax and quit being stupid."
Davis struck Maes in the face, knocking him to the pavement. Maes said in court that when he stood up from the fall, Davis continued to hit him. The minister's wife, later recalling the episode, said she had never in her life seen a man so full of rage. Just last month, after protracted legal proceedings, Davis pleaded guilty to a charge of third-degree misdemeanor assault and was sentenced to two years of probation. A judge ordered him to pay restitution and attend anger-management classes.
On the streets and in the markets of Pakistan, Raymond Davis remains the boogeyman, an American killer lurking in the subconscious of a deeply insecure nation. On a steamy summer night last summer, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed — the head of Lashkar-e-Taiba and the reason Davis and his team were sent to Lahore in the first place — stood on the back of a flatbed truck and spoke to thousands of cheering supporters less than a mile from Pakistan's Parliament building in Islamabad. A $10 million American bounty still hung over Saeed's head, part of a broader squeeze on Lashkar-e-Taiba's finances. But there he was, out in the open and whipping the crowd into a fury with a pledge to "rid Pakistan of American slavery." The rally was the culmination of a march from Lahore to Islamabad that Saeed ordered to protest American involvement in the country. The night before the march reached the capital, six Pakistani troops were killed by gunmen riding motorcycles not far from where the marchers were spending the night, leading to speculation that Saeed had ordered the attack.
But Saeed insisted that night that he was not to blame for the deaths. The killers were foreigners, he told the crowd, a group of assassins with a secret agenda to destabilize Pakistan and steal its nuclear arsenal. With a dramatic flourish, he said he knew exactly who had killed the men.
"It was the Americans!" he shouted to loud approvals. "It was Blackwater!" The cheers grew even louder. He saved the biggest applause line for last: "It was another Raymond Davis!"
This article is adapted from "The Way of the Knife: The C.I.A., a Secret Army, and a War at the Ends of the Earth," published by the Penguin Press.
Mark Mazzetti is a national-security correspondent for The Times. He shared a 2009 Pulitzer Prize for coverage of Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Editor: Joel Lovell


Yousuf Masti Khan -Pakistan Labour Party --Brilliantly Sums up the hopeless Pakistani State

Masti Khan of Pakistan Workers Party speaking on some Pakistani channels was bold and brilliant .



The gist of his talk was :--

1-The USA is allied with the Pakistani army not with people of Pakistan.

2-The Pakistani political and military leadership gets orders from USA because they are paid by USA in hard cash !

3-USA supports Saudi Arabia the most repressive regime in the world so how it expects the Muslim masses to believe that USA stands for democracy.food for thought.100 Marks to Mr Masti Khan from Balochistan.Such boldness is difficult to find anywhere other than Balochistan.

I dont think that all Pakistani channels mostly sponsored by Pakistani major political parties or pakistani military will dare to invite a truly honest man on TV again !






Agha Amin









Yusuf Masti Khan is a bold and daring progressive thinker from Balochistan.


I was lucky to see him once on TV.He spoke boldly and forthrightly that Pakistan is nothing but a vassal of USA and pakistans army is in reality an army of USA !

Pakistan is a country where any man who states the truth is branded as anti state while its foundation was based on collaboration !

The most genuine people were jailed , tortured and killed in this so called state !

He rarely comes on Pakistani TV because most of the characters you see on pakistani TV are men of straw with no guts and totally intellectually dishonest !




Many years ago I had discussed pakistans mercenary history in my article published in PRAVDA in October2001 :--






The Indo Pak Armies and Their Mercenary Calling 

by   


A.H Amin

PRAVDA-Sep 2001




AGHA.H.AMIN 

STATELESS MAN AND CITIZEN OF WILDERNESS

JALA KAY MASHAL I JAAN HUM JANOON SIFAAT CHALAY ,JO GHAR KO AAG LAGAYAY HAMATAY SAATH CHALAY



Pravda.RU:Main:More in detail
16:20 2001-09-24
A.H.AMIN:




THE INDO-PAK ARMIES AND THEIR MERCENARY CALLING






As the adage aptly describes, there is nothing worse than to do the right thing for the wrong reason. We may modify it slightly by rephrasing it as doing the right thing, or the supposedly right thing, for the wrong reason! The pre-1947 Indian Army was a mercenary army composed of villagers from barren, rain-irrigated areas of India! These mercenaries were employed against their own people right from 1757!


The Sepoys (as these mercenaries were called) fought for money just like the Senegalese in French occupied Africa fought for money! These mercenaries comprised many nationalities and religions. They killed the Santhals in Bengal and the Martathas in Central India; they destroyed Tipu Sultan in 1799; they fought against the freedom fighters of 1857 when a greater part of the Hindustani mercenaries rebelled against the British masters! They fought against the Punjabi Sikhs, who later on were enlisted as mercenaries!


They fought against the Afghans in three wars during 1839-42, 1878-80, and in 1919. In addition, they fought in countless expeditions in the Trans-Indus Frontier from 1843 to 1946, destroying livestocks, razing villages to the ground, and destroying wells. Internationally, these mercenaries fought against the Muslim Turks in the First Great War, against the Chinese in the Opium Wars and the Boxer Rebellion, and against the Germans and in the First and Second World Wars: all races that had nothing against India! In short, these men fought for a living against anyone, whether they be Muslim Christian, Buddhist, Indian, Turkish, German, or Chinese for a living!





Espirit de Corps was a cleverly coined British ploy to galvanize these mercenaries. There were exceptions to the mercenary rule. In 1857, the Bengal Army, some three-fourths of which was Hindustani Hindu led by one fourth Hindustani and Ranghar Muslims mostly from cavalry that rebelled against the English East India Company! Unfortunately, India was not a country, and the English Company found eager mercenaries in the northwest! They were eager to loot Delhi and panting to get land grants, Jangi Inams, and many more carrots that the cunning English colonials promised!


Opportunism became the rule of Indian society, now known as Indo Pak, whether it was poets, educationists, lawyers, civil servants, or soldiers! The Indians were a defeated people and they thought that the White man was invincible! There were some exceptions to apathy when Sher Ali, a tall, muscular Pathan, stabbed the British Viceroy Mayo in the Andaman Islands in 1872!


Lord Mayo Viceroy of India stabbed to death by Sher Ali Afridi in 1872.Only an Afridi and a tribal Pashtuncould have done it ! They are the only ones with some spine left ! HA HA HA



However, Sher Ali Afridi was an exception, and most Indians were far more pragmatic and opportunistic than a Pathan convict in Andamans!


Sher Ali Afridi who was not a mercenary ,but an Afridi is an Afridi




Thus, nobody remembers Sher Ali today except the Pashtun Students Federation, where his photograph tops the gallery of heroes!
Like a blossom today then scattered, how can the fragrance last forever ,


Sher Ali was ,however, an exception, and sycophancy and appeasement remained the cardinal lifescripts of most Indians.
Sher Ali Afridi






Some motivated Pathans of the tribal area minus the more opportunistic people of Mardan Charsadda Swabi Kohat and D.I Khan carried at the struggle that had its origins in Sayyid Ahmad Brelvis guerrilla war. Then came the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05!

 The myth of European superiority was broken! Some audacious men, mostly Bengali Hindus, decided to strike back! A bold man called Rash Behari Bose actually attacked the British Viceroy Charles Hardinge with a bomb containing gramophone needles and nails while he was entering Delhi in 1813. Unfortunately, Bihari failed to kill the viceroy. However, terror struck at the heart of the British!


So what if he was not a Muslim , he is and will remain our hero , because he was one!



Their viceroy was attacked not in far flung Andaman Islands but in the newly created imperial capital Delhi and not by a Wahabi but by a highly educated Bengali Hindu. Rash Bihari escaped, but the Indian Army did not wake up from the slumber of their mercenary sleep. The First World War was yet another testing ground for the mercenary Indian Army. In the words of one British historian, the Punjabi Muslims stood staunch as a rock while there was a question mark over the Pathans.






He did not ,however, add that these disloyal Pathans were not from settled districts of Mardan or Charsadda Kohat or Peshawar but from the tribal areas and from D.I Khan. Some Indian military men were ashamed of their degrading mercenary status and did rebel against the British.


Notable among these were the Hindustani Muslim Ranghars of the 5th Light Infantry, who for some time captured Singapore;



The real patriots , men of 125th Light Infantry ,  Singapore 1915


the Afridis of various Frontier Force Units, notably the indomitable Mir Mast Afridi; and some Mahsuds from the Mahsud Companies of the 129 and 130 Baluchis. Lastly, there were the Pathan Squadrons of Curetons 15 Lancers (the Punjabi Muslim Squadrons remaining pragmatically loyal).


Mehsud warriors fighting against British








Waziristan being bombed 1919



All these men died, but all men are mortal. Is it death that our rulers are afraid of or is it a billion dollar package that will give them immortality? Is collaboration at the rate of few billion the golden lesson that they are leaving for posterity? A pragmatic lesson one must say. One important development took place during the First World War.


 The Sikh Ghadrites, a group of Punjabis, some Hindus, and mostly Sikhs, did manage to subvert the Indian Army from their mercenary calling. They did not succeed, but many soldiers of scribes unit 23 Cavalry were court martialled and executed for conspiracy against British Empire.






On the whole, the Indian Army remained staunch even when martial law was imposed in Punjab in 1919, Gujranwala was bombed, many civilians flogged or made to crawl in the public, and many hundreds of civilians were killed by the army. The only inspiring incident of the Indian Army not being a mercenary force occurred in the 1930s, when the Garhwali Hindus soldiers of a unit of the Royal Garhwal Rifles refused to fire on the Pathan Muslim Redshirts demonstrating against the British.


Chandar Singh Garhwali who despite being a Hindu refused to open fire as a soldier of Garhwal Regiment at Peshawar in 1930.He was dismissed from the army and later elected as a member of parliament on Indian National Congress ticket



The Indian Army remained largely loyal in WW II, minus the Indian National Army in Burma. By and large, Indian independence had no connection with the Indian Army, who remained loyal mercenaries to the end to their British masters.


 In India Nehru reduced the army to its correct place, i.e. a servile instrument of policy of the civilians. In Pakistan, because the Muslim League the political party that led Pakistan, there was an a party of soldiers with a mercenary past, and with nothing to do with the political struggle to free India, they were able to usurp power.


 Since they were leaders of a mercenary army rather than a national army, they made the USA their godfather, making professions of being the vanguard of the USA, whether it was the protection of Anglo-Iranian Oil Fields or supporting Anglo-French claims over the Suez Canal. In the process of this abject appeasement, they managed an aid package from the USA. This was sufficient to make the Pakistan Army a sophisticated army but insufficient to win a war against India, not because of material reasons, but because of poor higher leadership and strategic and operational ineptness.





All throughout this period, the common Pakistani was anti-US anti-West, pro-Arab, and pro-Muslim. However, the common man was only a servile tool , democracy having been destroyed by 1958. The army remained a mercenary army with little national participation. It fought the 1965 War well, albeit at a battalion level, since beyond the battalion level, the more senior ranks were ones who had been programmed by the pre-1947 British to be company commanders at best. The 1965 War proved to be a watershed in Pakistani history, since it made clear the fact that the army was not a national army , since it was without participation from the country's east wing!

 This fact was realized by General Yahya, the new C in C, but it was too late. The result was a civil war followed by defeat in a conventional war and the break up of Pakistan into two states. Few lessons were learnt, and soon, the country's first post-1946 democratically elected government was dismissed amidst allegations of superpower involvement.


The army came with a 90-day promise to hold elections, which were never held. The gap between the people and the army grew, and the situation was saved only by the fact that the Zia military junta found a new master, more correctly a new paymaster, in the USA once the USSR invaded Afghanistan. For next nine years, Pakistan fought the USA's war against communism, only to be conveniently discarded like an syringe with a decade long life. A syringe used to inject poison into the Red Army and then thrown into the incinerator of history! Within three years of the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, the USA was all keen to declare Pakistan a terrorist state; the Americans have short memories.


Something like an impromptu encounter with a lass in a bar, followed by an expression of eternal love and everything forgotten the next day after the desired objective is achieved. Suddenly, in September 2001, precisely on the 11th of September, the USA suddenly woke up from a thirteen-year attack of insomnia and remembered that they had a very close friend called Pakistan: cheap friend led by a machine with a mercenary past. Thus, the latest US-Pakistan nexus.


What is the motivation of Pakistan's military elite to appease the USA? They are a bunch of men who came into power in an impromptu manner and suffer from a crisis of legitimacy. Since the end of the Cold War, mercenaries were no longer in demand and Pakistan's standing army was getting little aid from USA or any potential mercenary masters. The strikes September, 11th 2001 changed everything! Once again, Pakistan's elite got a chance that they had last received in 1979. Because they had missed one in the 1990-91 Gulf War, this time they are in no mood to miss another!


Their mercenary calling has been given a God-given opportunity! Without any deliberation, the military junta gave the US near divine status and offered their mercenary services against a neighbouring Muslim country.






Soon, this stand was rationalized by the military dictator in the name of Pakistan's best interest; that India would benefit if Pakistan did not go on its knees to appease the Americans; that the Israelis would attack Pakistan; that the USA was lesser of the two evils. Pakistan, the so-called bastion of Islam despite its 500,000 man army and an arsenal of nuclear weapons, is literally crawling in diplomatic language to appease the Americans. If this state created in the name of Islam is so vulnerable, then it should be declared the fifty-first state of the USA. It be a Puerto Rico or Panama with a US military presence.




 Why all the macho talk about being Momins and soldiers of Allah?


Macho soldier of Islam is at his knees on one phone call from Uncle Bush,HA HA HA

The macho soldier ! HA HA HA




Soldiers of Allah who will be doing sentry duty around prospective airfields from where US aircrafts would fly to subject Afghanistan to fire and destruction! If a few billion dollars are so important, then what is the difference between Sepoy Khudadad who fought for 18 Rupees a month in the 1920s for the King and against his enemies?






If this country cannot survive without oil imported for free or on a subsidized rate from a neighbouring country, why waste the tax payers' money on a foreign ministry that consumes some 28 crores per day!

God may have made us poor, but we became Be Ghairat (Shameless) by our own choice! There have been too many strange coincidences in the last month. The death of General G.A Khan, the descendant of the indomitable Alizais who defied British orders to fight against the Turks in Mesopotamia 1915 in Mesopotamia.


 The reader may note that the 15 Lancersso was an all-Muslim unit, but only its less pragmatic Pathan Squadrons refused to fight against the Turks, while the more pragmatic Punjabi Muslim Squadron obeyed orders like sheep. At the time of the blast, Pakistan's top intelligence official was in USA. The Chinese decided to make a port at Gwadar, which could also be a naval base. The Talibans were close to complete victory in Afghanistan!


The year 2001 is a watershed in Pakistani history. Either Pakistan will be condemned to be a country ruled by mercenaries, or it will became a true republic, an Islamic Republic or whatever one may call it. Are we so weak that one threat from a bully with an average IQ sends our leaders , so-called martial men who wear camouflage commando jackets, a clear and total violation of the army dress code, of the Pakistan army down to their knees?






What is the use of a Chinese policy if one ultimatum evaporates all the resolution that our military leaders are supposed to have? It makes one think whether or not the Holy Kaaba is in Mecca or a few thousand miles further West. To stab your neighbor in order to gain a few billion is being rationalised as pragmatic foreign policy. Even a courtesan called Hazrat Mahal did not collaborate with the British, fighting the war of Independence in Lucknow.


She did not surrender even once Lucknow was recaptured in March 1858 and died in exile in Nepal. Pragmatism would have meant accepting a pension that the British offered her and settling in India. However, this dancing girl was not a mercenary! What has happened? Our rulers have accepted the role of glorified coolies and camp followers of the USA! This country's rulers had sold their souls in 1954 once the first major treaty with USA was signed. After a great deal of kicking during the period of 1990-1999, they regained some pride.

The year 2001 has robbed this nation from being a nation of resolute man. We have been auctioned for a few billion dollars. Auctioned because a superpower wants access to the strategic underbelly of Russia and China. Auctioned because of valid strategic reasons. Our leaders have not learnt anything from Machiavelli, whom they do try or claim to read.

The men who collaborate with any superior power or play bargaining games with it are the first targets. Thus, the fate of Liaquat in 1951, the fate of Bhutto who defied USA but died a martyrs death  in 1979, and that of Zia in 1988 a collaborator mercenary. We have everything written on the wall. Its only the lack of perception that makes us blind. Even Russia and China will be the losers!


Is this helicopter for external enemies or killing your own people ! HA HA HA



 This so-called attack will stop on the Oxus River or at the Wakhan Strip. It will spread on into Chinese Turkestan (Sinkiang), Tajikistan, Kazakhastan, and to the Urals. If there is a minor Muslim separatist threat in China or Russia today, after a few years, these separatists will be getting Stingers to fight with until Siberia, Central Asia, Azerbaijan, and Sinkiang are sattellites of the Western powers. The Iranians are secretly rejoicing, but they must not forget that a Sunni Afghanistan is less of a threat than an Afghanistan administered under a US or UN mandate.

 The Talibans in all probability may be crushed, but Afghan nationalism will survive! Their will be new groups, new Ahmad Shah's, nd new Hikmatyars who will fight a new Holy war against US occupation with Chinese- and Russian-supplied weapons, such as those from the CIA during 1979-88.


The Russians must forget how the USA had behaved when they occupied Afghanistan in 1979. 14,000 Russians died, most because of of weapons supplied to the Afghan resistance by CIA. The USSR must redress the balance of 1979-88 during 2001-10. Let the invaders come and settle down in Kabul and Kandahar and then send gifts of 100 body bags each day to their home country!


Is this country a private security agency that can be hired for a few billion dollars? If that is the case, why not lease our forces to fight as mercenaries as they did before 1947? Never in Pakistani history was collaboration so openly defended and propagated. Even Finland, a country far smaller than Pakistan, fought without US or British aid honorably for a certain duration of time. Are the Indians such a threat that we have to compete with them in being timid and shameless? The mercenary calling of our state has once again triumphed! The "bastion of Islam" is too weak to withstand one verbal volley of a man who is angry about something that has happened many thousand miles away from this country.


To compound things further, we have journalists, thinkers, and so-called experts busy writing articles for Hazoor ka Iqbal Buland Karna! Opportunism, which was instilled in us by the British in 1757, has once again triumphed! Two countries were created in the name of religionto date,i.e., Israel and Pakistan. Israel has fought for its ideology. Ironically, Pakistan has retained its mercenary character. Wrong, forever on the throne and truth, forever on the Scaffold!


A.H.Amin Major Agha Humayun Amin (Retired) is an ex-tank corps officer and a military writer and correspondent. He is the author of two books on the Pakistan army. He has been the executive editor of Globe Karachi and a military writer.


Posted by at    

INDIANS ARE STRATEICALLY CLULESS AND PAKISTANI CIVIL MILITARY LEADERSHIP DANGEROUSLY INCOMPETENT

$
0
0

1 comment:

  1. A little disagreement. Pakistani army officers consider themselves the cream of Pakistan and hence they believe that there is no such thing as civil authority and democracy.

    Army plans its own goals while the civil bureaucracy sides with them and the squabbling politicians are left to their misery. People are clueless as ever.

    And this notion that US is totally destabilzing Pakistan is a myth because the US has not even started it seriously thanks to China and Russia.

    The day US decides to punish Pakistan, it would be game over for the country.


FROM MY DEAR FRIEND AMBASSADOR 
gajendra singh FROM INDIA

MY COMMENTS IN BOLD BLACK UNDERLINED YELLOW BACKROUND

WHILE INDIANS ARE OVERRATING SHARIF THE REGION IS ABOUT TO PLUNE INTO REAL STRATEGIC DEEP SHIT IN 2014-2016.PERSONALLY MY ASSESSMENT IS THAT NEITHER PAKI POLITICIANS OR GENERALS ARE CAPABLE OF DEALING WITH THE CHALLENGES



AGHA H AMIN



Nawaz Sharif and army coups 
Why Raheel Sharif was named Kayani's successor
G Parthasarathy 5/12/13 http://www.tribuneindia.com/2013/20131205/edit.htm#4
       ZULFIQAR BHUTTO, who never tired of boasting of how he had got the better of Indira Gandhi in Simla, appointed the obsequious Gen Zia-ul-Haq as Pakistan's army chief superseding six serving officers. Describing this appointment as her husband's greatest mistake, Begum Nusrat Bhutto told me in 1982 that her husband had been carried away by Zia's professions of eternal loyalty. There was even an occasion when, Quran in hand, Zia swore before Bhutto: "You are the saviour of Pakistan and we owe it to you to be totally loyal to you". Barely a year later, on July 5, 1977, Zia ousted Bhutto in a military coup staged by the army's infamous Rawalpindi-based 111 Brigade. On April 4, 1979, Zia had the person he described as the "saviour of Pakistan" hanged, after a farcical trial.

Nawaz Sharif appears to fight shy of appointing Pashtun officers with distinguished family connections to the post of army chief. AFP file photo

      Nawaz Sharif was a product of Zia's military rule, enjoying a meteoric rise under the patronage of Zia's military Governor of Punjab, Gen Ghulam Jilani Khan. It was a period when Zia was bent on destabilising India's Punjab province. Sharif's fondness for contacts with "Khalistanis" like the Washington-based Ganga Singh Dhillon continued even through his second term. When Benazir was voted to power in 1988, Sharif made common cause with Zia-appointed President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, the army chief, Gen Aslam Beg, and ISI chief Asad Durrani. Benazir was ousted and Sharif's Muslim League was swept to power in 1991. Sharif's ISI chief, a fundamentalist member of the Tablighi Jamat, Gen Javed Nasir staged the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts with assistance from Dawood Ebrahim.
ARMY BETTED ON SHARIF AS A GOOD YES MAN BUT SHARIF GOT OUT OF CONTROL AND MANOEUVRED TO HAVE HIS OWN SAY IN 1990.

GHULAM ISHAQ APPOINTED ASIF NAWAZ IN 1990 WO DID NOT GET ALON WELL WITH SHARIF BUT DIED IN JAN 1993


Sharif was sacked shortly thereafter by President Ghulam Ishaq Khan, but restored to office by the Supreme Court. When the army chief, Gen Asif Nawaz, with whom he had serious differences, died in mysterious circumstances, Sharif superseded three senior officials to appoint the soft-spoken Waheed Kakkar as the new army chief. Kakkar sent Sharif packing from office soon thereafter.

KAKAR WAS APPOINTED  BY GHULAM ISHAQ KHAN AND NOT NAWAZ

      Sharif learnt nothing from this experience. He unceremoniously forced the resignation of his army chief, Gen Jehangir Karamat, after he was re-elected in 1997, only to appoint a Muhajir, Gen Parvez Musharraf, as his army chief, believing Musharraf could be kept in check. He superseded a highly rated Pashtun Lt Gen Ali Kuli Khan.

 THE PASHTUN WAS SIMPLY SUPERSEDED AS HE WAS PERCEIVED AS A POLITICAL THREAT AND AS TOO POWERFUL

Believing that the nuclear tests of 1998 had given him unparalleled popularity and power and disregarding the fact that he was ruling a bankrupt country, Sharif encouraged and participated in Musharraf's Kargil misadventure. When the misadventure became a fiasco and he was forced to rush to the Clinton White House to bail him out, Sharif threw the entire blame on Musharraf for the international disgrace and disrepute his country faced following the Kargil misadventure. Growing mutual distrust and animosity between Sharif and Musharraf led to the coup of October 12, 1999, with Sharif being incarcerated and later bailed out by the Saudis.

      Sharif and the army establishment share much in common. Both have a proven track record of proximity to Mullah Omar and the Afghan Taliban. Both have close links with Hafiz Saeed and Lashkar-e-Taiba. Sharif also has close links with extremist anti-Shia groups like Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.

SHARIF HAS A SIMPLE AGENDA . SELL HIS SUGAR AND HAVE PEACE WITH INDIA. LET , TALIBAN OTHERS ARE NOT REALLY IMPORTANT. SHARIF NEEDS AN ARMY CHIEF WHO IS LAID BACK AND NOT A THREAT TO IS BUSINESS OR POLITICS


 But Sharif is averse to ceding almost total powers to the army and playing second fiddle on national security and foreign policy issues, like President Zardari was compelled to do by an assertive General Kayani. These are the considerations that motivated Sharif in appointing Raheel Sharif as Kayani's successor. Sharif bypassed Lt Gen Haroon Aslam, who was regarded by commentators within Pakistan as an "average officer" and kicked Kayani's protégé, Lt Gen Rashid Mahmud, up as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee. Gen Raheel Khan has a reasonable career profile, but is not regarded as likely to set the Indus on fire, by innovation and drive.

      What clinched Raheel Sharif's appointment was evidently his close relationship with Lt Gen (retd) Abdul Qader Baloch, a Sharif confidant, who is a Minister for Tribal Affairs. If Sharif was really interested in having an army chief who would deal effectively with the threat posed by religious extremism spearheaded by Tehriq-e-Taliban-e-Pakistan, most observers agree that he should have appointed Lt Gen Tariq Khan, the next in line for promotion. Khan is a Pashtun Armoured Corps officer, credited with restoring the shattered morale of the frontier constabulary after it was mauled by the TTP. It seems that Sharif still believes that he can buy peace with the TTP, which well-informed observers consider as unrealistic and dangerous. Sharif appears to fight shy of appointing Pashtun officers with distinguished family connections to the post of army chief.

GAS STATED EARLIER SHARIF HAS A ONE POINT AGENDA -- COMPLETE IS 5 YEAR TERM , MAKE MONEY AND HAVE AN ARMY WHICH DOES NOT DISTURB THESE OBJECTIVES

      As Director General of Military Training, Raheel Sharif is known to have stressed the importance of shifting attention, for the present, from an exclusively India-centric approach to focusing on internal challenges. He, however, lacks both the stature and resolve necessary for ending support for the Afghan Taliban, or for anti-India jihadi outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba. He also has a political boss who has an affinity for jihadi groups for use in both India and Afghanistan. While the Pakistan army may remain prepared to take on the TTP, it will not do so under Nawaz Sharif's leadership unless the internal security situation deteriorates significantly and destabilises Punjab province. Moreover, as the security situation deteriorates along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, there will be increasing allegations holding Afghanistan and India responsible for the activities of groups like the TTP.
PAKISTAN IS ABOUT TO GET INTO REAL THICK SHIT AND BOTH THE SHARIF AIMS WILL FALL FLAT ON THE GROUND
Top





American Tigress-Sondra Locke

The Punjab book wins another award

$
0
0


Dear All,

The second article on the new award is published. Comments are welcome.
Best Regards,
Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed
Visiting Professor, LUMS, Pakistan; Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Stockholm University; and Honorary Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. Latest publications: Winner of the Best Non-Fiction Book award at the Karachi Literature Festival: The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed), Oxford, 2012; and, Pakistan: The Garrison State, Origins, Evolution, Consequences (1947-2011), Oxford, 2013.  He can be reached at: billumian@gmail.com
Daily Times, Sunday, December 8, 2013

COMMENT : The Punjab book wins another award — II — Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed
There was a definite Sikh plan to eradicate all Muslims from East Punjab in case the partition handed over those areas and places the Sikhs believed they had a right to 

In my first article last Sunday on the Punjab book winning a second award, I had talked about Indian feminists Urvashi Butalia, Ritu Menon and Kamla Bhasin establishing a new trend in partition historiography by relying on oral histories and thus taking the Punjab story to the people, making it real and human. However, their work, which many of us applauded, was confined to the tragedy of some family members and Hindu and Sikh women from western Punjab. They did not look at the fate of Muslim women who too were devastated by the same processes of damnation, demonisation and dehumanisation of the 'other' and which typically manifests itself at its worst by capturing the women of the enemy community because that means that total defeat and humiliation has been inflicted upon it. That happened too and on a bigger scale.

However, that gap in partition studies in East Punjab on what happened to the Muslims of East Punjab has been filled by outstanding contributions by the very talented documentary filmmaker Ajay Bhardwaj, whose two films out of a trilogy of three — Rabba, Hun Kee Kariye and Milaan Ge Babe Rattan De Mele Te — are solid proof of the hell that broke loose on Muslims in East Punjab. He has covered an area from Jullundur to the outskirts of the former Malerkotla state. It is a most important contribution and I urge Indian academics to take proper notice of these documentaries. We need more such research from the other side.

Unfortunately, when Butalia reviewed the Indian edition of my book (The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed) in Tehelka in October 2011, she made a rather strange remark: "Scholars may differ with his analysis, and certainly I don't find myself in agreement with some of his arguments, in particular whether there was a Muslim plan to wipe out Hindus and Sikhs from the Punjab or a Sikh plan to wipe out Muslims." I have since then been waiting for those scholars who may have serious credentials as scholars and yet differ seriously with some of my arguments but, more importantly, the evidence I give of two different patterns about how, on both sides, the minorities were forced to leave. I had demonstrated that the Muslim League's ideology, election campaign, direct action at the beginning of 1947 (January 24 to February 26) and the encirclement of Sikh villages had produced an explosive situation — the first organised carnage of non-Muslims took place in those villages. I also showed that local conspiracies and plots involving Muslim League politicians, partisan judicial and police officials and ex-servicemen to attack Hindus and Sikhs did exist. From March to at least the beginning of July 1947, non-Muslims were at the receiving end in western and central Punjab except Amritsar. Yet, no evidence of a grand Muslim League plan to drive all Hindus and Sikhs out of Pakistan existed.

Attacks on East Punjab Muslims started at the beginning of July 1947 and escalated massively from August 17 when the Radcliffe Award was announced. It is only when they arrived in hundreds of thousands in Pakistani Punjab that the Hindus and Sikhs were finally driven out. I have given evidence of this with the help of the statement by the governor of West Punjab, Sir Francis Mudie, and a number of stories of Hindus and Sikhs who were not leaving because their Muslim neighbours wanted them to stay.

There was a definite Sikh plan to eradicate all Muslims from East Punjab in case the partition handed over those areas and places the Sikhs believed they had a right to on the basis of their religious significance and the greater property they owned. That plan was hatched at the highest levels of the Sikh leadership and I have given the details in my book. The Sikhs wanted to create a third state, Sikhistan/Khalistan but, since they were not in a majority anywhere in united Punjab, expelling the Muslims was imperative to bring the Sikhs from western Punjab and create a compact Sikh majority in central-eastern Punjab. This plan was agreed to in 1945.

As we know, the Radcliffe Award gave Lahore, Gujranwala and Sheikhupura to Pakistan as well as Montgomery and Lyallpur; only Amritsar was given to India. Immediately after the Radcliffe Award became public, organised and coordinated attacks on the Muslims of East Punjab began. Having said this, I do not want to blame one side more than the other. In fact, the book brings forth the greatness of humankind as well. There are amazing stories of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs going out of the way to protect people from the so-called enemy group. There is, however, a sort of conspiracy of silence, especially among Sikh scholars, in East Punjab. We in Pakistan have now smashed that conspiracy on our side.

The objectivity of the book is amply and abundantly confirmed by the reviews published in both India and Pakistan. Some highly respected academics and journalists from both sides complimented me in their reviews for undertaking such a daunting study and succeeding with it. Professor Pervaiz Vandal made a comment when I met him in Lahore, which I would like to share with my readers. He said, "You have shown how history can be written differently from the conventional methodology of examining official documents. You have gone to the people and come back and told us their story. Therefore, your book is a game changer."

I would add that there is another quality to the book that deserves the attention of political and social scientists. I have propounded a theory and a theoretical framework, which adds sophistication of the kind that historical studies can never achieve. The Punjab study is unique in detail but it is part of the universal experience of states disintegrating, and apprehensive and suspicious communities and their leaders being trapped in ethnic violence, ethnic cleansing and genocide. The former Yugoslavia is a case very much from our own times and my theory would help understand what happened there and in similar other situations.

(Concluded)

The writer is a visiting professor, LUMS, Pakistan; Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Stockholm University; and Honorary Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. Latest publications: Winner of the Best Non-Fiction Book award at the Karachi Literature Festival: The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed, Oxford, 2012; and Pakistan: The Garrison State, Origins, Evolution, Consequences (1947-2011), Oxford, 2013. He can be reached at:billumian@gmail.com



---



Showing 1 - 24 of 27 Results

 
DetailImage
Product Details

Intelligence Review (Volume 1) by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 1, 2013)

Product Details

Atlas and Military History of India Pakistan Wars (Volume 1) by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 13, 2012)

Product Details

Why Indian Army and Pakistan Army Failed in 1965 War by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 29, 2013)

Product Details

Border Trade Zone Concept by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 2, 2013)

Product Details

Military and Security Review-Volume 1 by Agha Humayun Amin and Hamid Hussain (Nov 9, 2013)

Product Details

Pakistan Army, 1971 India Pakistan War and after by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 13, 2012)


Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chawinda by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 3, 2012)

Product Details

Sepoy Rebellion of 1857-59 Reinterpreted by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)

Product Details

The Pakistan army till 1965 by Agha Humayun. Amin (1999)

  • Currently unavailable

Product Details

The Indian Army in Second World War by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 7, 2012)

Product Details

The Indian Army in the First World War by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 7, 2012)

Product Details

Military Leadership and Decision Making by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 28, 2012)


Product Details

Pakistan Army through eyes of Pakistani Generals by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)

Product Details

Books on Pakistan Reviewed by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)

Product Details

How the English East India Company Conquered India by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 2, 2012)


Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chamb 1971 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 3, 2012)

Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chillianwallah-13 January 1849 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 4, 2012)

Product Details

Atlas of Battles of Assal Uttar and Lahore-1965 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 4, 2012)


Product Details

Taliban War in Afghanistan-A Writers Transformed Perceptions from 2001 to 2011 by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 12, 2012)

Product Details

Mans Role in History by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 1, 2012)

Product Details

USA, ISI, AL QAEDA and TALIBAN Anatomy of Grand US Strategic Failure by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 14, 2012)

  • $18.00 Paperback 
  • Order in the next 21 hours and get it by Thursday, Nov 14.
  • FREE Shipping on orders over $35

Product Details

Atlas of 1857-59 WAR by Agha Humayun Amin (Apr 18, 2013)

Product Details

The Essential Clausewitz by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 26, 2012)

Product Details

IED,Drones and Suicide Bomber Warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistanby Mr Agha Humayun Amin (Sep 21, 2013)

Recipients

A BRILLIANT POLITICAL HISTORY OF PUNJAB FROM 1919 TO 1958

Why the US lost in Vietnam and will now lose in Afghanistan and Iran

$
0
0

Why the US lost in Vietnam and will now lose in Afghanistan and Iran


Agha.H.Amin


Only a player who believes in no morality and follows no rules will win.


In a war with professional assasins no rules need to be followed.




The US cause was doomed because there was LACK OF A CLEAR MILITARY MISSION AND STRATEGY , JUST LIKE IN AFGHANISTAN.


In Vietnam the right course should have been to overrun North Vietnam , the centre of gravity , just like in Afghanistan now the centre of gravity of the insurgents is in Pakistan.


US Goverment did not have the strategic resolution to go inside North Vietnam just like US lacks guts to go inside Pakistan.


A solution was possible if fire and sword had been carried  inside Vietnam.


Where there are two extremely different types of war being waged the state actor supporting the non state actor has to be overrun and here international law should be trampled.In any case moralists will find everything immoral in USAs conduct of war . So why bother about morality !


In Afghan war if the USSR had just overrun parts of Pakistan or helped India do so Afghan war would have been a USSR success story.


Even in case of Iran the US has to physically overrun Iran in case it has to be de-nuclearised.It is entirely feasible to overrun Iran via Afghanistan.The war can be made cheaper by promising Pashtun Afghans all to take home in booty that they can carry be it fixed material  or human assets.






It is important to forget about morality and do this or when the US withdraws the other side will proclaim it as a great victory of Islam ( real BS claim but one in which the nuts will believe)


Lastly the US media was greatest enemy of US war in Vietnam.I think since Vietnam US government has learned tricks to control the media.

AN AMERICAN BLOGGER ZENO ON POWER OF UNCONVENTIONAL FORCES AND THIRD WORLD STATE ACTORS

$
0
0

Covert operations and secret armies tend to have a boomerang or blowback effect. The antagonists tend to retaliate in a devastating response. It is sad how quickly, the lessons of 9/11 are forgotten. Bin Ladin success ratio 1:3000 and growing, even after 11 years, 14 Trillion dollars, there is ignominious defeatPeople living in remote caves in isolated corners of the globe can cause havoc, by using the tools modern society has invented. Fortunately, all nations are not that stupid. Chinese society is based on Confucian Analects, therefore, China, has kept itself out of major conflicts and is on the threshold of becoming a Super Power, but without, as the late great US.Sen.J.William Fulbright said, "the arrogance of power.' America has yet to learn these lessons. It keeps stumbling from one quagmire, Vietnam, to another, Afghanistan. It has made War, a de facto part of its society. It loves to sacrifice, it young, best, and the brightest, at the feet of Ares,the god of War. However, this penchant for War is weakening not only the American society; but also its position of global leader for democracy and social justice. The Military-Industrial Complex has now morphed into the Military-Industrial-Business Complex. War is good for business. To hell with the people of United States, let them eat cake!As a US tax payer, I am livid!


Irans Chah Bahar Port-The Indian Afghan Iran Strategy to reduce Karachi Port to size

$
0
0



Trilateral Meeting to Discuss Iran's Chabahar Port

 New Delhi, Aug 26 (Prensa Latina) Indian Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai will meet on Sunday with his colleagues from Iran and Afghanistan to discuss several issues of common interest, including the connectivity between the three countries.

 Shortly before leaving for Tehran, Mathai said that India is considering to participate in the strategic development of the Iranian port of Chabahar, an issue that will mark the agenda of this trilateral meeting.

 Diplomatic sources stated in New Delhi that for some time, India has been studying to make some investments in that port, located in southeast Iran, because it would serve as an alternative gateway to Central Asia, bypassing Pakistan.

 Iran has consented and proposed a further meeting between the parties, to discuss the idea in more details, according to Mathai.

 The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (of India) is studying a report presented by the Ports Association and containing suggestions about the development of the Chabahar port, the Indian official said.

 Mathai departed from this capital as an outpost of the Indian delegation to the 16th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), which will be headed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

 Singh will leave for Iran on Tuesday and he will meet with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Wednesday to discuss issues of mutual interest and revitalize trade between the two countries.

 jg/iff/ asg

Monday, July 23, 2012

Iran Opens Chabahar Port For Afghanistan


xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 


Iran Opens Chabahar Port For NATO SupplySmiling face (black and white)WOWSmiling face (black and white)

Iran Opens Chabahar Port For NATO Supply

Thursday, 10 May 2012 10:42 






Afghan officials from Ministry of Chamber & Commerce speaking on condition of anonymity have said that Afghanistan will be allowed to use Iran's Chabahar port for shipments and trade after the two countries signed an agreement in Kabul last Wednesday. 

It has also been learned that the Chabahar port has been financed by Indian government to maintain Iranian and Indian influence in Afghanistan after US forces leave Afghanistan in 2014. The second purpose, we believe of investment in this port is to counter Gwadar port of Pakistan.

The agreement was signed by Afghanistan's Minister of Commerce and Industries Anwar al Haq Ahady and the Iranian Ambassador to Afghanistan Abolfazl Zohrevand.

The endorsement of the pact means Afghan traders including those directly working with American contracting companies will be able to use the southeastern port – Iran's only port with direct access to the sea – for importing and exporting goods. 

The news of signing of this agreement comes as relief to US/NATO official since the closure of NATO supplies from Pakistan has caused massive setback in terms of finance to US/NATO.

Officials said the Chabahar port will help Afghanistan's trade-related transit problems and is likely to boost commercial transactions.

Ahady said that, according to the agreement, the first step involves building a hub near the port for Afghan traders to have a base for trading from.
The allocation of land is around 50 hectares and he expects traders would be able to use it within a year, he said.

"Through the efforts of the Afghan and Iranian officials, Chabahar as a transit route for Afghanistan has become a reality," he added.

A panel of officials from Iran who travelled to Afghanistan for the signing of the agreement said that 
many countries had applied to Chabahar Port for permission to use it, and Afghanistan with the help of Indian Investment had succeeded.

Ambassador Zohrevand welcomed the agreement saying it would help the economic expansion of Afghanistan as the port would provide greater access to Afghanistan into world markets.

"The outcome of this agreement is not only positive for Afghanistan and Iran relations, we also expect it to help the joint cooperation of Afghan and Iran traders so they can expand through cooperation to the Middle East and Asia," he said.

The agreement eases the pressure on the US-backed Afghan Government to rely on trade routes through Pakistan, as relations between the two countries have witnessed significant restrains in recent months.

It also signals the warming of relations between Iran and Afghanistan. Only last week the pair endorsed an agreement to allow for the transfer of prisoners sentenced in the other's country to serve their sentence in their native land.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


CHAH BAHAR ZAHIDAN ZARANJ DILARAM ROAD-by -Agha H Amin 




A Journalist wrote the following heralding the new great route for Afghanistan:---





"The 218-km road connecting Delaram (on the Kandahar-Herat highway) to Zaranj, on the border with Iran has been completed.

It will provide landlocked Afghanistan an alternative access to the sea, the Iranian port of Chahbahar, allowing it to break free from Pakistan's traditional stranglehold.


it remains to be seen if Iran will prove to be a better neighbour than Pakistan.

For Afghanistan, this is an opportunity to regain better access to the Indian market that it lost in 1947. For India, it is an opportunity to regain better access to Central Asia that it too lost in 1947."



The same writer then produces the below twit of a map to support his highly utopian assertions:--






Unfortunately its not as simple as that .The new route passes through some 218 km of ideal ambush country in Afghanistan and some 600 km of ideal ambush country in Iran.


Convoys would require heavy escorts and above all increase Irans clout in case the route is successful.


The route will expose ten times more vehicles carrying supplies as compared to the Pakistan route.


The threat to NATO communications in Pakistan is actually temporary and its possible that its a veiled protest with Pakistani governments involvement against US drone attacks which have made more enemies for USA without eliminating any of its real foes.


The USA needs to understand that Taliban are no longer internationally isolated.Its in the interest of all regional countries to ensure that the USA fails in Afghanistan.So the Taliban is no longer a fatherless child.They have many resourceful fathers now.The developing Chinese and Russian perceptions that if USA suceeds in Afghanistan it would be a fatal blow to both.


I drew the attached map below to illustrate the point:--





http://www.scribd.com/doc/92399986/Testimonials-Recommendations-and-Publications

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/83916444/Agha-H-Amin-Publications

 

http://indopakmilitaryhistory.blogspot.com/2011/09/pavo-11-cavalry.html

 

PUBLICATIONS AGHA H AMIN

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/61839666/Indo-Pak-Wars-A-Pictorial-History

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21686885/TALIBAN-WAR-IN-PAKISTAN-AFGHANISTAN-A-WRITERS-PERCEPTIONS-FROM-2001-TO-2011

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22457862/Military-Decision-making-and-leadership

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22151765/History-of-Pakistan-Army-from-1757-to-1971-PRINTING-ENABLED-Do-acknowledge-to-the-author

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22455178/Letters-to-Command-and-Staff-College-Quetta-Citadel-Journal

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23150027/Pakistan-Army-through-eyes-of-Pakistani-Generals

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23701412/War-of-Independence-of-1857

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22107238/HISTORY

 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21693873/Indo-Pak-Wars-1947-71-A-STRATEGIC-AND-OPERATIONAL-ANALYSIS-BY-A-H-AMIN-THIS-BOOK-CAN-BE-PRINTED-FROM-THIS-SITE

 

 


Brilliant and Immortal Military Thoughts-1

$
0
0

These are thoughts which will always sustain all who read military history and who actually practice the art of war.


Agha.H.Amin





The notes do not exceed five , 

                                        

                                                     but the changes of the five notes can never be fully heard.


The colours do not exceed five,


                                                      but the changes of the five colours can never be completely seen.


The flavours do not exceed five,


                                                      but the changes of the five flavours can never  be completely tasted.


In warfare the strategic configuration of power do not exceed the unorthodox and the orthodox , but the changes of the unorthodox and the orthodox can never be completely exhausted.THE UNORTHODOX AND THE ORTHODOX MUTUALLY PRODUCE EACH OTHER ,JUST LIKE AN ENDLESS CYCLE. WHO CAN EXHAUST THEM .


SUN SZU ON STRATEGIC MILITARY POWER




World Heading into REAL DEEP SH____T

$
0
0


World Heading into REAL DEEP SH____T


Agha H Amin





the game is played as the game maker wants , thats what is happening , however now we are surely heading for real thick shit as there is something seriously wrong with the games script at the strategic and operational level


THE RIGHT THING FOR US IS TO BE TOTAL PACIFISTS . ALL WARS IN AF PAK AND ASIA HELP THE FAT UGLY LOOKING RICH MEN IN THE SO CALLED ADVANCED COUNTRIES.


HOW IS THAT BRITISH JIHADIS SPREAD FIRE AND HAVOC IN FATA AND SYRIA !


SOME SAUDI PRINCES AND SOME US COMPANIES MAY MAKE HUGE AMOUNT OF DIRTY MONEY BUT THE WORLD IS DOOMED


TIME TO HAVE A DRINK,SOME TOP MAZAR SHARIF GARDA AND REFLECT


THIS IS NO ABOUT ISLAM OR TERRORISM


ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY



AGHA H AMIN


 




 


Saudi deals boosted US arms sales to record $66.3bn in 2011

* Saudi Arabia bought $33.4bn worth US weapons

* Russia, world's No 2 supplier, sees sales nearly halved

* French arms sales more than double 


WASHINGTON: Weapons sales by the United States tripled in 2011 to a record high, pumped up by $33.4 billion in sales to Saudi Arabia, but the international arms market is not likely to continue growing, according to a comprehensive new congressional report.

The United States sold $66.3 billion of weapons overseas in 2011, accounting for nearly 78 percent of all global arms sales, which rose to $85.3 billion in 2011, the highest level seen since 2004. The previous US record was set in 2008, when arms sales reached $38.2 billion, measured in 2011 dollars.

"The extraordinary total value of US weapons orders in 2011 distorts the current picture of the global arms trade market," said the report by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, calling $66.3 billion in US arms sales "a clear outlier figure."

While Washington remained the world's leading arms supplier, nearly all other major suppliers, except France, saw declines in 2011, according to the annual report prepared for Congress.

France signed arms sales valued at $4.4 billion in 2011, up from $1.8 billion a year earlier, but Russia, the world's number two arms dealer, saw its sales nearly halved to $4.8 billion in 2011. The four major European suppliers -- France, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Italy -- saw their collective market share drop to 7.2 percent in 2011 from 12.2 percent a year earlier.

Saudi Arabia was the biggest arms buyer among developing countries, concluding $33.7 billion in weapons deals in 2011, followed by India with purchases of $6.9 billion and the United Arab Emirates with $4.5 billion.

Total annual global arms sales ranged between $42 billion and $67 billion in the period from 2004 to 2011, reaching a cumulative total of $467.9 billion in that 8-year period.

A weaker global economy, the European financial crisis and the slow international recovery from the recession of 2008 have dampened demand for new weapons, with many countries putting off or scaling back their purchases, the report found.

Washington, for instance, generates a steady stream of orders for upgrades, spare parts, ammunition and support services from year to year, even when it does not conclude big deals for new weapons systems, the report said.

Concerns about Iran continued to fuel arms sales to the Middle East and especially Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, but India, Taiwan and other Asian countries were important arms buyers as well, said the report, written by Richard Grimmett and Paul Kerr.

Key US weapons sales in 2011 included: - $33.4 billion to Saudi Arabia for 84 Boeing Co F-15 fighters, dozens of helicopters built by Boeing and Sikorsky Aircraft, a unit of United Technologies Corp, $3.49 billion for Lockheed Martin Corp's Terminal High Altitude Area Defence, an advanced missile shield, to the United Arab Emirates, and $940 million for 16 Chinook helicopters built by Boeing, $1.4 billion for 18 F-16 fighter jets built by Lockheed Martin, a $4.1 billion agreement with India for 10 C-17 transport planes built by Boeing, and a $2 billion order by Taiwan for Patriot antimissile batteries. reuters





---



Showing 1 - 24 of 27 Results

 
DetailImage


Product Details

Intelligence Review (Volume 1) by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 1, 2013)


Product Details

Atlas and Military History of India Pakistan Wars (Volume 1) by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 13, 2012)


Product Details

Why Indian Army and Pakistan Army Failed in 1965 War by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 29, 2013)



Product Details

Border Trade Zone Concept by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 2, 2013)


Product Details

Military and Security Review-Volume 1 by Agha Humayun Amin and Hamid Hussain (Nov 9, 2013)


Product Details

Pakistan Army, 1971 India Pakistan War and after by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 13, 2012)



Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chawinda by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 3, 2012)


Product Details

Sepoy Rebellion of 1857-59 Reinterpreted by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)


Product Details

The Pakistan army till 1965 by Agha Humayun. Amin (1999)

  • Currently unavailable


Product Details

The Indian Army in Second World War by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 7, 2012)


Product Details

The Indian Army in the First World War by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 7, 2012)


Product Details

Military Leadership and Decision Making by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 28, 2012)



Product Details

Pakistan Army through eyes of Pakistani Generals by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)


Product Details

Books on Pakistan Reviewed by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)


Product Details

How the English East India Company Conquered India by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 2, 2012)



Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chamb 1971 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 3, 2012)


Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chillianwallah-13 January 1849 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 4, 2012)


Product Details

Atlas of Battles of Assal Uttar and Lahore-1965 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 4, 2012)



Product Details

Taliban War in Afghanistan-A Writers Transformed Perceptions from 2001 to 2011 by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 12, 2012)


Product Details

Mans Role in History by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 1, 2012)


Product Details

USA, ISI, AL QAEDA and TALIBAN Anatomy of Grand US Strategic Failure by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 14, 2012)

  • $18.00 Paperback 
  • Order in the next 21 hours and get it by Thursday, Nov 14.
  • FREE Shipping on orders over $35


Product Details

Atlas of 1857-59 WAR by Agha Humayun Amin (Apr 18, 2013)


Product Details

The Essential Clausewitz by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 26, 2012)


Product Details

IED,Drones and Suicide Bomber Warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistanby Mr Agha Humayun Amin (Sep 21, 2013)

Recipients
 


2012 The Year of War and Anarchy
Agha.H.Amin

We are moving towards a great global war and supreme strategic anarchy by remote pilot.

This happened because the pilots who were supposed to man policy and regulate the tide of history , did not have the talent to exercise their due role in history !

These pilots in reality wore the uniforms of pilots but had the caliber of air stewards and air pursers ! This includes Obama, Yusuf Raza Gillani , Man Mohan Singh and the Saudi king.

This brought us into a Sarajevo situation where events started moving decision makers rather than decision makers moving events.

Till 2008 the USA was led by an impetuous pilot with low IQ but a definite strategic decisiveness . A man with limited intellect , but one who could take strategic decisions.

After 2008 the USA got a social climber who looked outwardly smart and bright but lacked statesmanship and had a near zero strategic vision.

Thus Afghanistan after 2008 moved from relative calm into anarchy, as far as the south was concerned.

Pakistan was the worst case.It was led by an opportunist who attempted to please all parties including the Americans , Islamists, Pakistani liberals and the Indians.As a result Pakistan developed such a fatal " confusion of principle" that the whole Pakistani society was fractured down to its deepest foundations.

This military opportunist in turn made peace with the corrupt politicians to elongate his rule and Pakistans whole political fabric was shattered.

The Pakistani military was attacked by Islamists for allegedly being in league with the Christian powers.

The Pakistani military lost its entire credibility when it emerged as the main party in the controversial NRO deal which legitimised past corruption of Pakistans politicians which the army had prosecuted with zeal from 1999 to 2002.

Pakistan became engulfed in two major insurgencies , one with the Islamists and the other in Balochistan.Both have the potential to destabilise and even destroy Pakistan.

The US has no strategy in Afghanistan and is in a catch 22 unless it decides on a strategy of decisive action.

While the US policy makers saw Pakistan as centre of gravity of Islamists including Afghan Taliban the US failed to frame a decisive strategy to deal with Pakistan.

Pakistans nuclear assets , Chinese support and a growing Russian support are principal obstacles that the USA faces in formulating a strategy of decisive action against Pakistan.

Both Iran and Pakistan remain two strategic thorn lands that the USA faces and which are being constantly watered by China and Russia.

The Osama Raid and the Salala incident forced Pakistans military and political elite to close the NATO supply line to Afghanistan.

The memogate scandal also increased the civil military divide in Pakistan but this appears to be more of a US ploy to divide and weaken Pakistan.

The key strategic trends in this scenario are as following---

  1. Any US withdrawal in totality or partially would strengthen the Islamists in Afghanistan who will see full or partial defeat  of the US as a great victory of Islam.This would destabilise Pakistan and increase chances of Indo Pak war.
  2. US missile shield has permanently alienated Russia and Russia will re-assert itself and take the lead in aiding all anti US forces.
  3. US failure to correctly deal with Iran and Pakistan will further destabilise the situation.Pakistans nuclear assets will deter the US from any grand adventure against Pakistan.
  4. USA chances of an internal pro US coup in Pakistan by the PPP have become weak after Osama incident and the Salala incident.
  5. Chances of a military coup in Pakistan will get stronger as the situation moves and if Pakistani ISIs plan to bring a national government in power with Imran Khan fails.
  6. India still views Pakistan as  a grave strategic threat and remains apprehensive of Pakistans strategic nukes.This will ensure that the Indians will continue with aiding the low intensity war in Pakistan.

The US will try to follow a policy that reduces Pakistan to a smaller size and confines Pakistans nukes to Punjab.

In case of Balochistan it will not be difficult for the US to Balkanise Pakistan in case the US decides to support the Baloch secessionists.

Karachi remains a US strategic asset with the MQM and other elements who can paralyse Karachi at a few hours notice.

US policy will be difficult to formulate and execute.

No nuclear state was ever denuclearised by war.The policy that the US will follow will be to destabilise Pakistan and to present it as a danger to world peace like North Korea.

In the process even a small incident can initiate a grand strategic earthquake.

God help the USA,Pakistan,India and the world.




KISSINGER HEARS THE DRUMS OF WAR



 "If You Can't Hear the Drums of War You Must Be Deaf", Henry
 Kissinger, the most famous living practitioner of international
Statecraft  NEW YORK - USA - In a remarkable admission by former Nixon era Secretary of State, Henry Kissinger, reveals what is happening at the moment in the world and particularly the Middle East. Speaking from his luxurious Manhattan apartment, the elder statesman, who was 89 in May, is all too forward with his analysis of the current situation in the world forum of Geo-politics and economics. "The United States is bating China and Russia, and the final nail in the coffin will be
 Iran, which is, of course, the main target of Israel.


 We have allowed China to increase their military strength and Russia to recover from Sovietisation, to give them a false sense of bravado, this will create an altogether faster demise for them . We're like the sharp shooter daring the noob to pick up the gun, and when they try, it's bang. The coming war will be so severe that only one superpower can win, and that's us folks. This is why the EU is in such a hurry to form a complete superstate because they know what is coming, and to survive,Europe will have to be one whole cohesive state. Their urgency tells me that they know full well that the big showdown is upon us. O how I have dreamed of this delightful moment.

  "Mr. Kissinger then added: "If you are an ordinary person, then you can prepare yourself for war by moving to the countryside and building a farm, but you must take guns with you, as the hordes of starving will be roaming. Also, even though the elite will have their safe havens and specialist shelters, they must be just as careful during the war as the ordinary civilians, because their shelters can still be compromised. "After pausing for a few minutes to collect his thoughts, Mr. Kissinger, carried on: "We told the military that we would have to take over seven Middle Eastern countries for their resources and they have nearly completed their job. We all know what I think of the military, but I have to say they have obeyed orders superfluously this time. It is just that last stepping stone, i.e. Iran which will really tip the balance..

How long can China and Russia stand by and watch America clean up? The  great Russian bear and Chinese sickle will be roused from their slumber and this is when Israel will have to fight with all its might and weapons to kill as many Arabs as it can. Hopefully if all goes well, half the Middle East will be Israeli. Our young have been trained well for the last decade or so on combat console games, it was interesting to see the new Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 game, which mirrors exactly what is to come in the near future with its predictive programming. Our young, in the US and West, are prepared because they have been programmed to be good soldiers, cannon fodder, and when they will be ordered to go out into the streets and fight those crazy Chins and Russkies, they will obey their orders. Out of the ashes we shall  build a new society, there will only be one superpower left, and that one will be the global government that wins. Don't forget, the United States, has the best weapons, we have stuff that no other nation has, and we will introduce those weapons to the world when the time is right.



PUBLICATIONS , RECOMMENDATIONS AND TESTIMONIALS AGHA H AMIN




BRIEF HISTORY OF PAVO 11 CAVALRY


PUBLICATIONS AGHA H AMIN


















Intelligence Review (Volume 1),Military and Security Review-Volume 1

$
0
0


---



Showing 1 - 24 of 27 Results

 
DetailImage


Product Details

Intelligence Review (Volume 1) by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 1, 2013)


Product Details

Atlas and Military History of India Pakistan Wars (Volume 1) by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 13, 2012)


Product Details

Why Indian Army and Pakistan Army Failed in 1965 War by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 29, 2013)



Product Details

Border Trade Zone Concept by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 2, 2013)


Product Details

Military and Security Review-Volume 1 by Agha Humayun Amin and Hamid Hussain (Nov 9, 2013)


Product Details

Pakistan Army, 1971 India Pakistan War and after by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 13, 2012)



Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chawinda by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 3, 2012)


Product Details

Sepoy Rebellion of 1857-59 Reinterpreted by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)


Product Details

The Pakistan army till 1965 by Agha Humayun. Amin (1999)

  • Currently unavailable


Product Details

The Indian Army in Second World War by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 7, 2012)


Product Details

The Indian Army in the First World War by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 7, 2012)


Product Details

Military Leadership and Decision Making by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 28, 2012)



Product Details

Pakistan Army through eyes of Pakistani Generals by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)


Product Details

Books on Pakistan Reviewed by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 10, 2012)


Product Details

How the English East India Company Conquered India by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 2, 2012)



Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chamb 1971 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 3, 2012)


Product Details

Atlas of Battle of Chillianwallah-13 January 1849 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 4, 2012)


Product Details

Atlas of Battles of Assal Uttar and Lahore-1965 by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 4, 2012)



Product Details

Taliban War in Afghanistan-A Writers Transformed Perceptions from 2001 to 2011 by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 12, 2012)


Product Details

Mans Role in History by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 1, 2012)


Product Details

USA, ISI, AL QAEDA and TALIBAN Anatomy of Grand US Strategic Failure by Agha Humayun Amin (Nov 14, 2012)

  • $18.00 Paperback 
  • Order in the next 21 hours and get it by Thursday, Nov 14.
  • FREE Shipping on orders over $35


Product Details

Atlas of 1857-59 WAR by Agha Humayun Amin (Apr 18, 2013)


Product Details

The Essential Clausewitz by Agha Humayun Amin (Oct 26, 2012)


Product Details

IED,Drones and Suicide Bomber Warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistanby Mr Agha Humayun Amin (Sep 21, 2013)

Recipients

Stray Reflections,Thoughts,Ramblings,Reveries

$
0
0

Posts



------------------------

Pageviews by Countries

Graph of most popular countries among blog viewers
Entry Pageviews

United States

7070

Russia

1912

Ukraine

655

Germany

541

Poland

484

India

467

France

447

Pakistan

442

United Kingdom

414

China

335

Pageviews by Browsers

Entry Pageviews

Internet Explorer

5948 (34%)

Firefox

5786 (33%)

Chrome

2462 (14%)

Opera

2082 (12%)

Safari

579 (3%)

Mobile Safari

45 (<1%)

YaBrowser

44 (<1%)

BingPreview

33 (<1%)

Qt

29 (<1%)

NS8

28 (<1%)
Image displaying most popular browsers

Pageviews by Operating Systems

Entry Pageviews

Windows

14656 (85%)

Linux

1274 (7%)

Macintosh

601 (3%)

Other Unix

196 (1%)

Windows NT 6.1

126 (<1%)

iPhone

84 (<1%)

iPad

71 (<1%)

Android

52 (<1%)

compatible

28 (<1%)

BlackBerry

7 (<1%)

КРАСНОЙ АРМИИ ВМФ AirForce ИСТОРИЯ-RED ARMY NAVY AIRFORCE HISTORY

$
0
0



--------------

Pageviews by Countries

Graph of most popular countries among blog viewers
Entry Pageviews

United States

36754

Russia

7359

Ukraine

4993

Germany

4424

United Kingdom

4008

France

3439

Pakistan

2387

Poland

1786

China

1472

Netherlands

953

Pageviews by Browsers

Entry Pageviews

Firefox

35590 (35%)

Internet Explorer

32499 (32%)

Chrome

15668 (15%)

Opera

10951 (11%)

Safari

2549 (2%)

BingPreview

1285 (1%)

PhantomJS

315 (<1%)

Mobile Safari

235 (<1%)

GranParadiso

167 (<1%)

YaBrowser

156 (<1%)
Image displaying most popular browsers

Pageviews by Operating Systems

Entry Pageviews

Windows

84082 (84%)

Linux

7077 (7%)

Macintosh

5093 (5%)

Windows NT 6.1

1223 (1%)

Other Unix

861 (<1%)

iPhone

361 (<1%)

iPad

304 (<1%)

Android

295 (<1%)

Nokia

153 (<1%)

compatible

113 (<1%)
Image displaying most popular platforms

100 Notable Books of 2013

$
0
0
FROM OSAMA LONE

100 Notable Books of 2013

Holiday Books: The New York Times Book Review looks at art books, travel books, cookbooks and more.

Animation by Johnny Kelly/Nexus

FICTION & POETRY

THE ACCURSED. By Joyce Carol Oates. (Ecco/HarperCollins, $27.99.) Oates's extravagantly horrifying, funny and prolix postmodern Gothic novel purports to be the definitive account of a curse that infected bucolic Princeton, N.J., in 1905 and 1906.

ALL THAT IS. By James Salter. (Knopf, $26.95.) Salter's first novel in more than 30 years, which follows the loves and losses of a World War II veteran, is an ambitious departure from his previous work and, at a stroke, demolishes any talk of twilight.

AMERICANAH. By Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. (Knopf, $26.95.) This witheringly trenchant novel scrutinizes blackness in America, Nigeria and Britain.

BLEEDING EDGE. By Thomas Pynchon. (Penguin Press, $28.95.) Airliners crash not only into the twin towers but into a shaggy-dog tale involving a fraud investigator and a white-collar outlaw in this vital, audacious novel.

CHILDREN ARE DIAMONDS: An African Apocalypse. By Edward Hoagland. (Arcade, $23.95.) The adventure-seeking protagonist of Hoagland's novel is swept up in the chaos of southern Sudan.

THE CIRCLE. By Dave Eggers. (Knopf/McSweeney's, $27.95.) In a disturbing not-too-distant future, human existence flows through the portal of a company that gives Eggers's novel its title.

CLAIRE OF THE SEA LIGHT. By Edwidge Danticat. (Knopf, $25.95.) Danticat's novel is less about a Haitian girl who disappears on her birthday than about the heart of a magical seaside village.

THE COLOR MASTER: Stories. By Aimee Bender. (Doubleday, $25.95.) Physical objects help Bender's characters grasp an overwhelming world.

A CONSTELLATION OF VITAL PHENOMENA. By Anthony Marra. (Hogarth, $26.) Odds against survival are high for the characters of Marra's extraordinary first novel, set in war-torn Chechnya.

THE DINNER. By Herman Koch. Translated by Sam Garrett. (Hogarth, $24.) In this clever, dark Dutch novel, two couples dine out under the cloud of a terrible crime committed by their teenage sons.

DIRTY LOVE. By Andre Dubus III. (Norton, $25.95.) Four linked stories expose their characters' bottomless needs and stubborn weaknesses.

DISSIDENT GARDENS. By Jonathan Lethem. (Doubleday, $27.95.) Spanning 80 years and three generations, Lethem's novel realistically portrays an enchanted — or disenchanted — garden of American leftists in Queens.

DOCTOR SLEEP. By Stephen King. (Scribner, $30.) Now grown up, Danny, the boy with psycho-intuitive powers in "The Shining," helps another threatened magic child in a novel that shares the virtues of King's best work.

DUPLEX. By Kathryn Davis. (Graywolf, $24.) A schoolteacher takes an unusual lover in this astonishing, double-hinged novel set in a fantastical suburbia.

THE END OF THE POINT. By Elizabeth Graver. (Harper, $25.99.) A summer house on the Massachusetts coast both shelters and isolates the wealthy family in Graver's eloquent multigenerational novel.

THE FLAMETHROWERS. By Rachel Kushner. (Scribner, $26.99.) In Kushner's frequently dazzling second novel, an impressionable artist navigates the volatile worlds of New York and Rome in the 1970s.

THE GOLDFINCH. By Donna Tartt. (Little, Brown, $30.) The "Goldfinch" of the title of Tartt's smartly written Dickensian novel is a painting smuggled through the early years of a boy's life — his prize, his guilt and his burden.

THE GOOD LORD BIRD. By James McBride. (Riverhead, $27.95.) McBride's romp of a novel, the 2013 National Book Award winner, is narrated by a freed slave boy who passes as a girl. It's a risky portrait of the radical abolitionist John Brown in which irreverence becomes a new form of ­homage.

A GUIDE TO BEING BORN: Stories. By Ramona Ausubel. (Riverhead, $26.95.) Ausubel's fantastical collection traces a cycle of transformation: from love to conception to gestation to birth.

HALF THE KINGDOM. By Lore Segal. (Melville House, $23.95.) In Segal's darkly comic novel, dementia becomes contagious at a Manhattan hospital.

I WANT TO SHOW YOU MORE: Stories. By Jamie Quatro. (Grove, $24.) Quatro's strange, thrilling and disarmingly honest first collection draws from a pool of resonant themes (Christianity, marital infidelity, cancer, running) in agile ­recombinations.

THE IMPOSSIBLE LIVES OF GRETA WELLS. By Andrew Sean Greer. (Ecco/HarperCollins, $26.99.) A distraught woman inhabits different selves across the 20th century in Greer's elegiac novel.

THE INFATUATIONS. By Javier Marías. Translated by Margaret Jull Costa. (Knopf, $26.95.) Amid a proliferation of alternative perspectives, Marías's novel explores its female narrator's relationship with the widow and the best friend of a murdered man.

THE INTERESTINGS. By Meg Wolitzer. (Riverhead, $27.95.) Wolitzer's enveloping novel offers a fresh take on the theme of self-invention, with a heroine who asks herself whether the ambitious men and women in her circle have inaccurately defined success.

LIFE AFTER LIFE. By Kate Atkinson. (Reagan Arthur/Little, Brown, $27.99.) Atkinson's heroine, born in 1910, keeps dying and dying again, as she experiences the alternate courses her destiny might have taken.

LOCAL SOULS: Novellas. By Allan Gurganus. (Liveright, $25.95.) This triptych, set in Gurganus's familiar Falls, N.C., showcases the increasing universality of his imaginative powers.

LONGBOURN. By Jo Baker. (Knopf, $25.95.) Baker's charming novel offers an affecting look at the world of "Pride and Prejudice" from the point of view of the Bennets' servants' hall.

LOVE, DISHONOR, MARRY, DIE, CHERISH, PERISH. By David Rakoff. (Doubleday, $26.95.) Rakoff completed his novel-in-couplets, whose characters live the title's verbs, just before his death in 2012.

THE LOWLAND. By Jhumpa Lahiri. (Knopf, $27.95.) After his radical brother is killed, an Indian scientist brings his widow to join him in America in Lahiri's efficiently written novel.

THE LUMINARIES. By Eleanor Catton. (Little, Brown, $27.) In her Booker Prize winner, a love story and mystery set in New Zealand, Catton has built a lively parody of a 19th-century novel, while creating something utterly new for the 21st.

MADDADDAM. By Margaret Atwood. (Nan A. Talese/Doubleday, $27.95.) The survivors of "Oryx and Crake" and "The Year of the Flood" await a final showdown, in a trilogy's concluding entry.

A MARKER TO MEASURE DRIFT. By Alexander Maksik. (Knopf, $24.95.) Maksik's forceful novel illuminates the life of a Liberian woman who flees her troubled past to seek refuge on an Aegean island.

METAPHYSICAL DOG.By Frank Bidart. (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $24.) To immerse oneself in these poems is to enter a crowd of unusual characters: artistic geniuses, violent misfits, dramatic self-accusers (including the poet himself).

OUR ANDROMEDA. By Brenda Shaughnessy. (Copper Canyon, paper, $16.) In these emotionally charged and gorgeously constructed poems, Shaughnessy imagines a world without a child's pain.

SCHRODER. By Amity Gaige. (Twelve, $21.99.) In Gaige's scenic novel, a man with a long-established false identity goes on the run with his 6-year-old daughter.

THE SIGNATURE OF ALL THINGS. By Elizabeth Gilbert. (Viking, $28.95.) In this winning novel by the author of "Eat, Pray, Love," a botanist's hunger for explanations carries her through the better part of Darwin's century, and to Tahiti.

SOMEONE. By Alice McDermott. (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $25.) Through scattered recollections, this novel sifts the significance of an ordinary life.

THE SON. By Philipp Meyer. (Ecco/Harper­Collins, $27.99.) Members of a Texas clan grope their way from the ordeals of the frontier to celebrity culture's absurdities in this masterly multigenerational saga.

THE SOUND OF THINGS FALLING. By Juan Gabriel Vásquez. Translated by Anne McLean. (Riverhead, $27.95.) This gripping Colombian novel, built on the country's tragic history with the drug trade, meditates on love, fate and death.

SUBMERGENCE.By J. M. Ledgard. (Coffee House, paper, $15.95.) This hard-edged, well-written novel involves a terrorist hostage-taking and a perilous deep-sea dive.

SUBTLE BODIES. By Norman Rush. (Knopf, $26.95.) Amid dark humor both mournful and absurd, former classmates converge on the hilltop estate of a friend who has died in a freak accident.

TENTH OF DECEMBER: Stories. By George Saunders. (Random House, $26.) Saunders's relentless humor and beatific generosity of spirit keep his highly moral tales from succumbing to life's darker aspects.

THE TWELVE TRIBES OF HATTIE. By Ayana Mathis. (Knopf, $24.95.) Mathis's deeply felt first novel works at the rough edges of history, within a brutal and poetic allegory of a black family beset by tribulations after the Great Migration to the North.

THE TWO HOTEL FRANCFORTS. By David Leavitt. (Bloomsbury, $25.) In Leavitt's atmospheric novel of 1940 Lisbon, as two couples await passage to New York, the husbands embark on an affair.

THE VALLEY OF AMAZEMENT. By Amy Tan. (Ecco/HarperCollins, $29.99.) This wrenching novel by the author of "The Joy Luck Club" follows mother and daughter courtesans over four decades.

WANT NOT. By Jonathan Miles. (Houghton Miff­lin Harcourt, $26.) Linking disparate characters and story threads, Miles's novel explores varieties of waste and decay in a consumer world.

WE ARE ALL COMPLETELY BESIDE OURSELVES. By Karen Joy Fowler. (Marian Wood/Putnam, $26.95.) This surreptitiously smart novel's big reveal slyly recalls a tabloid headline: "Girl and Chimp Twinned at Birth in Psychological ­Experiment."

WE NEED NEW NAMES. By NoViolet Bulawayo. (Reagan Arthur/Little, Brown, $25.) A Zimbabwean moves to Detroit in Bulawayo's striking first novel.

WOKE UP LONELY.By Fiona Maazel. (Graywolf, $26.) Maazel's restlessly antic novel examines the concurrent urges for solitude and intimacy.

THE WOMAN UPSTAIRS. By Claire Messud. (Knopf, $25.95.) Messud's ingenious, disquieting novel of outsize conflicts tells the story of a thwarted artist who finds herself bewitched by a boy and his parents.

NONFICTION

AFTER THE MUSIC STOPPED: The Financial Crisis, the Response, and the Work Ahead. By Alan S. Blinder. (Penguin Press, $29.95.) The former Fed vice chairman says confidence would have returned faster with better government communication about policy.

THE AMERICAN WAY OF POVERTY: How the Other Half Still Lives. By Sasha Abramsky. (Nation Books, $26.99.) This ambitious study, based on Abramsky's travels around the country meeting the poor, both describes and prescribes.

THE BARBAROUS YEARS. The Peopling of British North America: The Conflict of Civilizations, 1600-1675. By Bernard Bailyn. (Knopf, $35.) A noted Harvard historian looks at the chaotic decades between Jamestown and King Philip's War.

THE BILLIONAIRE'S APPRENTICE: The Rise of the Indian-American Elite and the Fall of the Galleon Hedge Fund. By Anita Raghavan. (Business Plus, $29.) Indian-Americans populate every aspect of this meticulously reported true-life business thriller.

THE BLOOD TELEGRAM: Nixon, Kissinger, and a Forgotten Genocide. By Gary J. Bass. (Knopf, $30.) Bass reveals the sordid White House diplomacy that attended the birth of Bangladesh in 1971.

BOOK OF AGES: The Life and Opinions of Jane Franklin. By Jill Lepore. (Knopf, $27.95.) Ben Franklin's sister bore 12 children and mostly led a life of hardship, but the two corresponded constantly.

THE BOY DETECTIVE: A New York Childhood. By Roger Rosenblatt. (Ecco/HarperCollins, $19.99.) In his memoir, Rosenblatt recalls being a boy learning to see, and to live, in the city he scrutinizes.

THE BULLY PULPIT: Theodore Roose­velt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism. By Doris Kearns Goodwin. (Simon & Schuster, $40.) Historical parallels in Goodwin's latest time machine implicitly ask us to look at our own age.

THE CANCER CHRONICLES: Unlocking Medicine's Deepest Mystery. By George Johnson. (Knopf, $27.95.) Johnson's fascinating look at cancer reveals certain profound truths about life itself.

CATASTROPHE 1914: Europe Goes to War. By Max Hastings. (Knopf, $35.) This excellent chronicle of World War I's first months by a British military historian dispels some popular myths.

COMMAND AND CONTROL: Nuclear Weapons, the Damascus Accident, and the Illusion of Safety. By Eric Schlosser. (Penguin Press, $36.) A disquieting but riveting examination of nuclear risk.

COUNTRY GIRL: A Memoir. By Edna O'Brien. (Little, Brown, $27.99.) O'Brien reflects on a fraught and distinguished life, from the restraints of her Irish childhood to literary stardom.

DAYS OF FIRE: Bush and Cheney in the White House. By Peter Baker. (Doubleday, $35.) Baker's treatment of the George W. Bush administration is haunted by the question of who was in charge.

ECSTATIC NATION: Confidence, Crisis, and Compromise, 1848-1877. By Brenda Wine­apple. (Harper, $35.) A masterly Civil War-era history, full of foiled schemes, misfired plans and less-than-happy ­endings.

EMPRESS DOWAGER CIXI: The Concubine Who Launched Modern China. By Jung Chang. (Knopf, $30.) Chang portrays Cixi as a proto-feminist and reformer in this authoritative account.

THE FARAWAY NEARBY. By Rebecca Solnit. (Viking, $25.95.) Digressive essays, loosely about storytelling, reflect a difficult year in Solnit's life.

FIVE DAYS AT MEMORIAL: Life and Death in a Storm-Ravaged Hospital. By Sheri Fink. (Crown, $27.) The case of a surgeon suspected of euthanizing patients during the Katrina disaster.

GOING CLEAR: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief. By Lawrence Wright. (Knopf, $28.95.) The author of "The Looming Tower" takes a calm and neutral stance toward Scientology, but makes clear it's like no other church on earth.

THE GUNS AT LAST LIGHT: The War in Western Europe, 1944-1945. By Rick Atkinson. (Holt, $40.) The final volume of Atkinson's monumental war trilogy shows that the road to Berlin was far from smooth.

THE HEIR APPARENT: A Life of Edward VII, the Playboy Prince. By Jane Ridley. (Random House, $35.) He was vain, gluttonous, promiscuous and none too bright, but "Bertie" emerges as an appealing character in Ridley's superb book.

A HOUSE IN THE SKY. By Amanda Lindhout and Sara Corbett. (Scribner, $27.) A searing memoir of a young woman's brutal kidnapping in Somalia.

JONATHAN SWIFT: His Life and His World. By Leo Damrosch. (Yale University, $35.) A commanding biography by a Harvard professor.

KNOCKING ON HEAVEN'S DOOR: The Path to a Better Way of Death. By Katy Butler. (Scribner, $25.) Butler's study of the flaws in end-of-life care mixes personal narrative and tough reporting.

LAWRENCE IN ARABIA: War, Deceit, Imperial Folly and the Making of the Modern Middle East. By Scott Anderson. (Doubleday, $28.95.) By contextualizing T. E. Lawrence, Anderson is able to address modern themes like oil, jihad and the Arab-Jewish conflict.

LEAN IN: Women, Work, and the Will to Lead. By Sheryl Sandberg with Nell Scovell. (Knopf, $24.95.) The lesson conveyed loud and clear by the Facebook executive is that women should step forward and not doubt their ability to combine work and family.

LOST GIRLS: An Unsolved American Mystery. By Robert Kolker. (Harper, $25.99.) Cases of troubled young Internet prostitutes murdered on Long Island add up to a nuanced look at prostitution today.

MADNESS, RACK, AND HONEY: Collected Lectures.By Mary Ruefle. (Wave Books, paper, $25.) The poet muses knowingly and merrily on language, writing and speaking sentences that last lifetimes.

MANSON: The Life and Times of Charles Manson. By Jeff Guinn. (Simon & Schuster, $27.50.) Guinn's tour de force examines Manson's rise and fall, the 1960s music industry and the decade's bizarre ambience.

MARGARET FULLER: A New American Life. By Megan Marshall. (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, $30.) Fuller's extensive intellectual accomplishments are set in contrast with her romantic disappointments.

MEN WE REAPED: A Memoir. By Jesmyn Ward. (Bloomsbury, $26.) A raw, beautiful elegy for Ward's brother and four male friends, who died young in Mississippi between 2000 and 2004.

MISS ANNE IN HARLEM: The White Women of the Black Renaissance. By Carla Kaplan. (Harper, $28.99.) A remarkable look at the white women who sought a place in the Harlem Renaissance.

MY BELOVED WORLD. By Sonia Sotomayor.(Knopf, $27.95.) Mostly skirting her legal views, the Supreme Court justice's memoir reveals much about her family, school and years at Princeton.

MY PROMISED LAND: The Triumph and Tragedy of Israel. By Ari Shavit. (Spiegel & Grau, $28.) Shavit, a columnist for Haaretz, expresses both solidarity with and criticism of his countrymen in this important and powerful book.

PATRICK LEIGH FERMOR: An Adventure. By Artemis Cooper. (New York Review Books, $30.) The British wayfarer and travel writer is the subject of Cooper's affectionate, informed biography.

THE RIDDLE OF THE LABYRINTH: The Quest to Crack an Ancient Code. By Margalit Fox. (Ecco/HarperCollins, $27.99.)Focusing on an unheralded but heroic Brooklyn classics professor, Fox turns the decipherment of Linear B into a detective story.

THE SKIES BELONG TO US: Love and Terror in the Golden Age of Hijacking. By Brendan I. Koer­ner. (Crown, $26.) Refusing to make '60s avatars of the unlikely couple behind a 1972 skyjacking, Koerner finds a deeper truth about the nature of extremism.

THE SLEEPWALKERS: How Europe Went to War in 1914. By Christopher Clark. (Harper, $29.99.) A Cambridge professor offers a thoroughly comprehensible account of the polarization of a continent, without fixing guilt on one leader or nation.

THE SMARTEST KIDS IN THE WORLD: And How They Got That Way. By Amanda Ripley. (Simon & Schuster, $28.) A look at countries that are outeducating us — Finland, South Korea, Poland — through the eyes of American high school students abroad.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE. By David Finkel. (Sarah Crichton/Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $26.) Finkel tracks soldiers struggling to navigate postwar life, especially the psychologically wounded.

THE THIRD COAST: When Chicago Built the American Dream. By Thomas Dyja. (Penguin Press, $29.95.) This robust cultural history weaves together the stories of the artists, styles and ideas that developed in Chicago before and after World War II.

THIS TOWN: Two Parties and a Funeral — Plus Plenty of Valet Parking! — in America's Gilded Capital. By Mark Leibovich. (Blue Rider, $27.95.) An entertaining and deeply troubling view of Washington.

THOSE ANGRY DAYS: Roosevelt, Lindbergh, and America's Fight Over World War II, 1939-1941. By Lynne Olson. (Random House, $30.) The savage political dispute between Roosevelt and the isolationist movement, presented in spellbinding detail.

TO SAVE EVERYTHING, CLICK HERE: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. By Evgeny Morozov. (PublicAffairs, $28.99.) Digital-age transparency may threaten the spirit of democracy, Morozov warns.

TO THE END OF JUNE: The Intimate Life of American Foster Care. By Cris Beam. (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, $26.) Beam's wrenching study is a triumph of narrative reporting and storytelling.

UNTHINKABLE: Iran, the Bomb, and American Strategy. By Kenneth M. Pollack. (Simon & Schuster, $30.) The Mideast expert makes the case for living with a nuclear Iran and trying to contain it.

THE UNWINDING: An Inner History of the New America. By George Packer. (Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $27.) With a nod to John Dos Passos, Packer offers a gripping narrative survey of today's hard times; the 2013 National Book Award winner for nonfiction.

THE WAR THAT ENDED PEACE: The Road to 1914. By Margaret Mac­Millan. (Random House, $35.) Why did the peace fail, a Canadian historian asks, and she offers superb portraits of the men who took Europe to war in the summer of 1914.

WAVE. By Sonali Deraniyagala. (Knopf, $24.) Deraniyagala's unforgettable account of her struggle to carry on living after her husband, sons and parents were killed in the 2004 tsunami isn't only as unsparing as they come, but also defiantly imbued with light.

WILD ONES: A Sometimes Dismaying, Weirdly Reassuring Story About Looking at People Looking at Animals in America. By Jon Mooallem. (Penguin Press, $27.95.) Mooallem explores the haphazard nature of our efforts to protect endangered ­species.

YEAR ZERO: A History of 1945. By Ian Buruma. (Penguin Press, $29.95.) This lively history shows how the Good War turned out badly for many people and splendidly for others less deserving.

A version of this article appears in print on December 8, 2013, on page BR26 of the Sunday Book Review with the headline: 100 Notable Books of 2013.

Viewing all 411 articles
Browse latest View live